mthor Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/alec-baldwin-rust-case-suddenly-dismissed-over-withheld-evidence-its-a-complete-embarrassment-to-the-prosecutors-expert-says-192022322.html 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 Yup case dismissed. at the end of the day $$ and the fact that it was another’s responsibility to make sure the gun was safe, that got him off. 2 Quote
mthor Posted July 13, 2024 Author Posted July 13, 2024 (edited) 26 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: Yup case dismissed. at the end of the day $$ and the fact that it was another’s responsibility to make sure the gun was safe, that got him off. Enough money for a law team good enough to find out that the prosecutor and police screwed up. Let the civil suits begin! Edited July 13, 2024 by mthor 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 It was overreach from the beginning. This should have been handled in civil court where Baldwin’s role as a producer could be litigated, and he does have civil liability for not maintaining a safe workplace. 3 Quote
tsar4 Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 7 hours ago, scoobdog said: It was overreach from the beginning. This should have been handled in civil court where Baldwin’s role as a producer could be litigated, and he does have civil liability for not maintaining a safe workplace. He was also responsible for hiring someone who should not have been in the position she was in. 3 Quote
Jman Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 Given it was Arizona, I wouldn't be surprised if the prosecutor was some GOP sycophant who wanted to jail Baldwin as revenge for all those insults to Der Furher. Either way, they screwed up badly on a technicality, and a good lawyer would have spotted the thread a mile away. 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted July 13, 2024 Posted July 13, 2024 4 hours ago, tsar4 said: He was also responsible for hiring someone who should not have been in the position she was in. Was she directly hired by Baldwin? I kind of think that would have been a more important point in his prosecution. Quote
lupin_bebop Posted July 16, 2024 Posted July 16, 2024 (edited) I figured this would happen. The thing they could get him on was negligent homicide. Even then, it was going to be a flimsy case. There IS a difference between criminal charges and civil charges here. Baldwin's civil charges might stick, on account of maybe...MAYBE not maintaining safe workplace standards as a producer. Even then, it's a stretch that things would be concrete. Given all the moving parts (and the fact that the Props and Effects Departments that control them) here, I could possibly see one or some of the crew being held responsible, but that's partially due to money being a factor. Even if it wasn't, they would have to be the ones you'd be pointing the finger at. I DO understand the impulse to pin Baldwin for it, but it wasn't going to work from the jump, in my opinion. Edited July 16, 2024 by lupin_bebop Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.