hunh.

[Satou Kazuma]

in reference to that one "rapey" song.

[scoobdog]

Uh.... cool?

[Mini_ghost420]

there's no way anybody's gonna read that. get wrecked.

[Raptorpat]

^ i read it

and it was interesting

[tsar4]

4 minutes ago, Mini_Ghost said:

there's no way anybody's gonna read that. get wrecked.

I did, and they're right.

[Mini_ghost420]

how'd you guys read it? it's weird on my screen

[Raptorpat]

i clicked to open the image, clicked the image to open it fullscreen, and clicked a third time to zoom in

[NaBarney]

That was way better than the convo I heard btwn idiot radio DJs the other day abt how the me too movement is trying to cancel Christmas 

[wacky1980]

i was about to say this conversation happened like a year or two ago, and here we are repeating it all over again. 

[Mini_ghost420]

16 hours ago, Admin_Raptorpat said:

^ i read it

and it was interesting

I read it and I think it's right.

[scoobdog]

It's almost as silly as the counter argument about it being rapey.  Context indeed is everything, but the song still trivializes the cultural norms of that era in a way that somewhat belittles the serious nature of it.  The reason "self respecting" women didn't participate in this behavior was that the consequences were comparatively draconian.

[CutieQuesadilla]

I thought it was interesting.

[wacky1980]

1 hour ago, scoobdog said:

The reason "self respecting" women didn't participate in this behavior was that the consequences were comparatively draconian.

and that's where the conversation re: this song should be looking. it would be a more fruitful conversation, at least.

[1pooh4u]

Cool, it’s a song about 2 people dtf but only 1 can admit it. Also Christmas