HardcoreHunter

Okay first part is Ron and Beard having a back and forth over who will be disposed first. Then Vic was to give his deposition on the 30th of may, had to cancel. Vic was asked for a confidentiality agreement which was denied. Ron Asks for a protective Order for his clients. Beard believes this is unnecessary and will not be used in good faith only to further clutter discovery. Evidence Ron brings up youtube personalities Yellow Flash and Nick Rekitea. Then I lost count of the number of time he says SJW in a serious document. I don't really know what he's going for here as far as evidence to support his defense though. I digress he begins some passive aggressive pats on the back to the youtuber Rekitea and his interviews with Beard. Okay so then Ron says that Beard organized an SJW riot for people to attack SJW. So I think he's calling the Youtubers and Beard SJW; while at the same time referring to SJW tactics of the people they'd be fighting? I can't watch the video in the pdf of what anyone said, but pretty much Ron is saying someone in the video said something. It railed up some people and they doxxed people on social media. Then the rest of his defense seems to be a video and things that Rekitea said. Lastly he takes a jab at Beard showing that he sells fear the beard merch and is profiting off of this. I'm trying to think exactly what he's going for here from a defense standpoint. In short there is no evidence in this defense to aid their defense. It's just showing that Vic supporters exist and it's not just the kickvic side that are over reacting. In a defense a lot of small things can help form a big picture, but right now I'm just not seeing where he's fully going with that. I believe the Jab against Beard is to attack his credibility. This is an odd play. Usually you'd want to attack Vic's credibility, make Vic look like someone who isn't trustworthy. Kinda interested to see where they're going with that; or if the judge will demand relevance. As a defense he would have to explain how this pertains exactly to his clients. Either way the whole reason for a defense is to prove that your clients didn't do what the plaintiff said they did. I think this will be a time will tell kinda deal if more cards are played on the table. I enjoy 4D chess as much as the next guy, but I have no idea where he's going with this in terms of a defense. Still I will give them credit for at least putting something out there. Hopefully they pull something interesting out of this.

I closed the video the moment that Flash Gordon shit came up. Though I do have some new submissions from Ron and the defendants that I'll post after I'm through reading it. I'll just post it now so you can read ahead of me if you feel like it, it's 48 pages shouldn't take too long.

Says it right in the home page. Perfect Facades, the plot thickens

Just half ass it and dress as him from Evil Dead 1. Act like a stuttering bitch, wear all denim, forget that you had a sister who was raped by a tree and killed your friend and girlfriend.

Seele is watching all of Nerv

I'm sure you'd learn something about a sub if you talked to him and weren't using a passive aggressive allegory. My brother is a Tax Accountant and he taught me about tax forms that I wouldn't have known had I not conversed with him about it. It's just who you learn things from can help. Had I said I learned law from talking to my dog, that would just be non-sense. I'm not saying I'm a judge or a lawyer, but I do seem to understand the justice system more than the bulk of this thread. I've even said though that my word isn't an open and shut case, just my opinion based on evidence and how I believe the case will progress; and I'm sure there is still information that none of us will be privy to until the case is well underway.

Do you now think that I'm this dog and this is the dog that was taking the photo's that it wasn't in.

She also has a sister, I got her for pretty much free because she didn't meet breed show standard. Instead she has what you'd call a working coat which is when they have short hair instead of long fluff.

But yeah that's the dog that went blood thirsty and was chasing someone out of my yard last night.

To this day she still thinks she's that small.

Would you prefer easily offended? I'm not the most up to date person on the kids trends these days, and didn't get the memo for the change. I also just find it easier to call a spade a spade. Much like how I've been called an incel a half dozen times in this thread. Also I was on lunch phone posting and had to hurry it along. Either way it's best to try and select the demographic that will most easily sympathies with your case, but at the same time needs to be covert enough to not be removed by another attorney. Really you want to ask questions that will trick the other attorney into picking someone that you would have picked yourself to get it stacked in your favor. An issue that often pops up though is the sample of candidates in general. Conservatives are more likely to show up in samples due to voting registration. As well convicted criminals are barred from being on a jury, so a minor drug offense like possession of marijuana can keep you out of the jury box, even if it is legal to have now simply because they were tried before it's legality. This is why many cases of a trial by ones peers are often not really of who you may consider peers. However a Jury trial is more prone to take emotion and moral ethics into account, while a Judge is more prone to look at things from a black and white law text standing; which is more at where I'm looking at it from. Also it took me a while to realize that was a mic drop. At first I thought it was a naruto cosplay with a badly made kunai.

Keep it up and you'll have to answer to this beast

One of my dads drinking buddies is a district judge. So I more or less just picked if up over years of casual conversation with him. And yeah I think you're right about the Hogan case, which does show that I do make mistakes and my opinion on the Vic case isn't open and shut. As for the Jury they're hand picked by both attorney it isn't really random. The sample that they are given is random, but they chose from this large pool the Jury they want on their team. So it would make sense for Ron to pick Jury that are Young, Female, SJW prone or a combination of those. However Beard and Ron can in turn ask the candidates questions to see if they have bias. An attorney can even remove another attorney's selection without cause; which is called a peremptory challenge. This will continue until we end up with the 12 for the jury box. A judge though will rarely ever put up with a peremptory challenge if it is going to encroach upon the court-date; by law it can however lawyers try not to get on a Judges bad side by doing so, especially in a civil case. A judge can also overturn a Jury verdict if they feel that the jury hasn't fully understood the evidence. This is known as the 13th juror, and is usually only used by the judge in criminal cases; and simply results in a hung jury. The judge can then call for a mistrial. The Judge then has two options, first is order a new trial, second is he says that in their opinion after witnessing the evidence provided that they feel there is no reason to waste the courts time; and can throw out the case. If this happens Vic has the option to appeal which then goes into appeals court; this is effectively a panel of Judges looking over Judge A's decision to throw out the plaintiffs case; as well if it should go to a higher court which would usually only happens in a civil case when you're suing a large company like Vic vs Funimation, and never really a work place harassment charge. People often do things that are nonsense. I've had my neighbor call the cops on me twice because my dog barked at her when she trespassed on my lawn for her dog to go to the bathroom and she felt threatened.

My brother has a brown eye and blue eye oddly enough. The dog is Ellie.

What isn't normal about a 30 years old man; with a teenage anime girl as their icon, on a message board at 2:40 a.m. I bet you wandered through my yard just to catch a glimpse of how a normal person looks!

So you wandered around my yard because your waifu is frigid

You're all supposed to stay indoors and watch anime with your waifu pillows and away from normal people.

Did you find any

Why Quackers, just why?

And my dogs chased them off. Which of you was it, come clean.

Still 90s

As a public figure you pretty much lose your right to privacy within public. Pretty much why celebrities can be photographed in public, but everyone else has to sign a waver or have their face blurred out. However you're still protected from defamation. Hulk Hogan for example won that Defamation case against Gawker for 115 million dollars. However they were just going to keep it going in appeals court; so despite being awarded 115 million, Hogan agreed to take 36 million in fuck you money. However this was also at a time when Gawker was hated by all the big money corps for leaking secrets to the public. So many do believe that this was just an excuse to punish them. Much like when people will sometimes get the maximum punishment for minor crimes in order to send a message.

He does have to present proof, but the others have to have a defense that is more than just "nuh uh"; which they can't properly provide if they keep jacking around on this paperwork. They will still be allowed to state objections to knowledge that is privy to the court; ie you can object hypothetical evidence/statements, or object contradictory statements and evidence. However they won't be able to present a counter argument that could grant them a not guilty verdict with the evidence that has been submitted thus far from my view. Their refusal and nigh defiance to oblige discovery; may hinder their ability to even gain witness testimony on their behalf. I don't really know the appeal process in Texas, but they may be trying a long game where they are actually planning on appealing this case, until they actually have enough people to mount a reasonable defense. Pretty much you would want enough pieces of evidence to create reasonable doubt that Vic's claims are bunk. Not to mention that they are in a court in the conservative heart of texas; that aren't known for their "woke" ways of thought. In turn I'm thinking that Vic may easily drop his case against Funi. When you sue a large company there is a good chance they just throw you shut up/fuck you money to stay out of court. Ted Turner actually said this which was a big mistake on his part because then WCW wrestlers were suing TNT every time they left and he'd just write them a half million dollar check to stay out of court. Microsoft on the other hand will fight anyone; they're one of the most vindictive companies on earth; and will abuse the appeals process to tie up litigation for years. So I'm thinking that in the case of Funi; Vic thought that Sony would either write him a fuck you check, or he's just going to drop it because even if he wins, sony can appeal him into the poor house before they'd ever have to pay him. I've never really been a fan of the whole apology is an admission of guilt philosophy. Media a lot of times runs both ways with this, where they'll freak out if someone doesn't apologize or they refuse to say anything; and they'll also have the whole apology is a sign of guilt double edged sword. I have said in the past that I do believe that there is probably some backstage drama going on. However a lot of things that had been shared sounded more like years of annoyance rather than sexual assault. The only case I've heard of actual possible sexual misconduct was when Vic kissed Monica 12 years ago at an anime con; and that story has changed a couple of times because I've also heard it as "tried to kiss". Really I'd say that they're both possibly at fault. Vic seems like an in the moment kind of guy that isn't fully able to pick up on social ques, and Monica from messages I've seen that she sends to Vic; really gives off some flirtatious ques even if not intentional. I've been at con room parties and VA's get wrecked. Back in 07 I had to carry Katie Gray back to her room because she got so wasted and gave her a bucket to puke in; she had to miss her panels and pay back the con for her room, flight, and a fine for breaking contract. However I also remember there used to be an after dark VA panel where VA's would talk about pretty much what horrible people they are towards each other. A lot of the stuff said in those would make a drunk kiss sound like playground shit. Then there is the literal playground annoyance stuff that is the bulk of the list like the jellybean, having nightmares, Hair pulling, Vic being annoying and yanking her arm to translate japanese etc. I even talked with her at Tekko 2017 and she said that Vic was fun to work with when I asked who she likes working with; which really goes along side that video I posted of her talking with and hugging Vic; and the messages she was sending him while they were doing the broly movie with kiss emoji right before the shit hit the fan. It still feels like there is a missing piece that neither side is fully being honest about. However Jamie hasn't really said anything other than she Hates Vic and he harassed her, before she went on her game of dodging subpoena. I did read a message that Jamie wrote to someone that said that all of her claims of sexual harassment had happened so long ago that they surpass the statute of limitations. Depending on the state the statute of limitations is 180-300 days to report sexual harassment; and she was asking anyone who had been harassed by Vic to come forward to report it, however as far as I know there have been no criminal cases filed. Just lots of blog/twitter/tumbler posts made from alleged incidents. From Funi's view they have an easy defense though. Once again Voice Actors are freelance. What they do while not under contract and not within a Sony owned facility is none of their concern. They have no responsibility for what happens to their VA's or fans at conventions. They are more than easily going to be able to cover their ass.