Top Gun

In any case that kicked major ass and I absolutely want more of it. Battletech meets Top Gun meets Super Sentai Gundam with great action direction? Right in my veins please.

ITT people still give a shit about ratings numbers in 2019.

I'm sure you'll be back either way. You're too much of a pathetic bitch to leave like you promised.

Because it's kind of totally hilarious?

Zeni's ride?

I mean I'm sure they smocked rock.

>_>

Fire Force is a high-profile shounen adaptation with a crapload of hype. This is a great pickup, horrific events notwithstanding.

Um, who has?

I'd say that's exactly what Blum is doing. He's retweeting to raise awareness on some really vile shit that should get anyone with a soul royally pissed off.

If you can't deal with people having opinions on things, you should probably avoid ever leaving the house.

"Here are all the shows you pirated weeks ago because we're massive clusterfucks who think the only way people consume media is in 13-episode chunks!"

Yeah, I mean RWBY was such a massive critical flop, right? Oh wait.

...the fuck would I complain? That looks badass.

Um, no? ...what change in management? FUNi's streaming service is adding some of Nozomi's titles. Nozomi isn't losing the licenses to the titles, and FUNi isn't gaining them. This isn't rocket science.

I love how every other retweet is OMG MEGAS XLR!!! If only. 🙁

Y'know the saddest part is that I'm so used to Toei Background Faces from the past decade's worth of One Piece episodes that they don't even register with me anymore.

It's really more to get Nozomi's stuff streaming on a more visible platform. I think they just have most of their series available on their YouTube channel.

Hawt

Yes, we all know that anime fans have fucking awful taste.

Um, no? I mean how many people in the general anime fandom still actively give a shit about that series?

You're entirely over-thinking it. FUNi's lawyers are solely concerned with FUNi's own defense, and they don't want FUNi being named as a third party in separate suits that FUNi had nothing to do with. Their mentioning of Vic's own statements is to further the case that Vic himself admitted at least some degree of culpability. That's it.

Please stop reminding me of the hot fucking garbage that was that series. I'd managed to forget most of it.

They're not "throwing anyone under the bus." They're simply stating the fact that FUNi's own tweets on the matter are the only relevant ones to the suit against FUNi specifically, and that because Vic is a public figure (which he absolutely is), the entire foundation of the suit is invalid. There's a massive difference between not being responsible for any tweets Monica and Jamie may have chosen to make, and making the decision to stop working with an alleged sexual predator who made unwanted advances on other people they were employing. Apparently part of Vic's original suit (absurdly enough) is that FUNi was responsible by proxy for those tweets by other people, which falls flat on its face under any sort of logic. And nothing in that document states that FUNi had any sort of permanent "contract" with Vic, only that, like all of its voice actors, it contracts them independently for specific roles. Seriously your takes on this continue to be complete bullshit.

Oh, you mean "hay guiz look at her she's so hot and thirsty for our milquetoast protagonist isn't this show awesome?!"