naraku360

You said you wouldn't tell anyone!

I'm touchy about the subject because I would like to use it to accommodate disabilities that prevent me from doing art traditionally. I don't have much confidence already without the endless barrage of people effectively saying the only form of art I think I might be able to use will never be good, and being clearly unwilling to have basic conversations about it. Every time I see it, I'm reminded how useless I am.

The more important part was the director not wanting footage used for a negative review. Can the director just ban their footage from reviews posted to Youtube? The answer, by the way, is literally no. If they put a copyright strike on it, it's a crime because it is protected by Fair Use and false strikes are not legal. Doesn't stop people, but it's protected. What we do all day, spamming memes we found on the internet, is quite literally more theft than what you're describing. As for the pausing movie thing, I was getting at more along the lines of death of the author. Like you can't control the work after it's out in the wild. The standard doesn't work when applied elsewhere. The plagiarism claim would not hold up in court when the result is completely different from the original.

shut up packard

I just never really got this argument. I'm sure a movie director might get upset that footage of their film was used in a negative review, but it's not their right to stop someone from using it in a transformative way. The author doesn't own how people use their art in their own time. The director doesn't get to burst into my house and scream at me to stop pausing so often, so why should self-entitled artists get to control images that are unrecognizable from the original?

Yes, that does seem to be the case. Can't say I expected MTG to have me excited for her bullshit.

How is MTG managing to be reasonable? Wtf is happening?

Actual cannibal, Packard.

Dude, check out the nipples though.

You need a fact checker to count to 6?

Nah, that would get him a spot in Trump's administration. Packard isn't so ambitious.

You know, you would have a much easier time talking to people if you bothered to pay attention to who it is, right?

He has proudly declared before that he doesn't understand the concept of screennames.

The problem is we would know what was found had he not stepped down. That's real suspicious and you'd be a fool to say otherwise.

Why are you like this?

..... What in the actual fuck are you on about?

Privatized health insurance happened to them.

We would've seen it by now had Trump not picked him and had Gaetz not resigned. Isn't it weird that he resigned right before the hearing that would've revealed the evidence?

Every time I almost feel bad for the dogpiling, you post again. It's like talking to the human equivalent of an online kangaroo. Aggressive and stupid, but with the body of a sad old guy. You feel kinda bad seeing an animal get bullied, but you really are a truly unpleasant dude and unlike a kangaroo, your brain isn't supposed to be smooth.

It's a testament to our dedication to being completely unhelpful.

You blamed the machine for your mistake.

Lol