naraku360

dpassé

Yeah, Toonamites definitely don't know what a vagina is.

Yet you came to his thread. Probably in more than one way.

You were wrong.

Zenigundumb

You don't keep them in your home?

Only this one?

Hellsing fucking sucks.

You're not making any sense right now, Zeni.

I hate my job at all times. I never don't want to quit.

Yahoo still exists?

Is that supposed to look like rubber?

We really didn't need to see samples of your porn folder

GODDAMNIT.

You would if you weren't an idiot.

Sounds like a terrible convention.

If it's the beta era it should be working much better for you than it is.

You know he's rubbing his bare butterball ass cheeks all over her furniture, too.

You should take a break from the internet. We'll tell you when you're ready to come back.

I mean, your question works both ways.

Basically every deity has been formulated off assumptions and implausible claims. He may be right that proving a negative is harder than proving a positive, yet scientific evidence largely suggests a nonexistence of god or gods. And the evidence for the positive? Fox News amd shitty blogs run by people who deliberately avoid understanding science?

But science has already disproven a huge chunk of the bible. If most of it isn't credible on even small scale details, why should we believe it on the grandest, most abstract level?

Good.

Hilarious?