Oh, well this isn't cooked yet.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, André Toulon said:

Soooooo....when you get a receipt, you want "tariff" to be on it, otherwise it's not happening to you.

 

My Skagen didn't come with any tarrif and neither did the solar powered radio I just bought.  The receipt is not relevant.  It's about where you're buying things and what you're buying.

If you're going to buy a new car, there's probably a hidden tarrif.  If you're going to buy a ten year old car, no tarrif.  Roll with that on everything you buy.

 

Edited Saturday at 11:17 PM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

56 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

Court rulings.

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

Edited Saturday at 11:13 PM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[André Toulon]

This made me grin uncontrollably....this man tried to use this opportunity to count his Bootleg trash watch as a win

[1pooh4u]

This thread is fuckin stupid 

[1pooh4u]

Just now, André Toulon said:

This made me grin uncontrollably....this man tried to use this opportunity to count his Bootleg trash watch as a win

This thread should just be disappeared 

[1pooh4u]

“I buy stuff second hand. No tariffs!  I rape junkyards at night! No tariffs!”

         Packard

”Hey look at this right wing state propaganda news site I linked. Some Americans will get rebates from the tariffs they already paid!”

          Also Packard 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 minute ago, André Toulon said:

This made me grin uncontrollably....this man tried to use this opportunity to count his Bootleg trash watch as a win

Sorry, pal... it's already been authenticated.  I took it to Palace Jewelers for a battery and it's unmistakable to the man who installed the battery.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 minute ago, 1pooh4u said:

“I buy stuff second hand. No tariffs!  I rape junkyards at night! No tariffs!”

         Packard

”Hey look at this right wing state propaganda news site I linked. Some Americans will get rebates from the tariffs they already paid!”

          Also Packard 

When did I say any of that?

[naraku360]

11 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

 

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You protest too much.

 

[1pooh4u]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

When did I say any of that?

All the time in every fuckin thread because you’re fuckin stupid. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, 1pooh4u said:

All the time in every fuckin thread because you’re fuckin stupid. 

No, that's your personal shit superimposed on what was actually said.

 

[naraku360]

The biased judge:

 

[naraku360]

7 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

This thread is fuckin stupid 

Packard is fuckin stupid

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

Just now, naraku360 said:

The biased judge:

 

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

[André Toulon]

6 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Sorry, pal... it's already been authenticated.  I took it to Palace Jewelers for a battery and it's unmistakable to the man who installed the battery.

Bro stfu🤣 what is wrong with you

[1pooh4u]

4 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

No, that's your personal shit superimposed on what was actually said.

 

No, that’s what you actually said because you collect junk and then brag about it like a fuckin idiot 

[1pooh4u]

“hUrR dUrR i DiDnT pAy 4 It. i FoUNd iT oN tHe BuS urrrrr”

    Packard 5 seconds from now 

[naraku360]

15 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

Prove it 

[mthor]

30 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Sorry, pal... it's already been authenticated.  I took it to Palace Jewelers for a battery and it's unmistakable to the man who installed the battery.

People tend to humor the intellectually feeble. Did he pat your head and give you a lollipop, too?

[André Toulon]

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

Prove it 

How about the fact that this wasn't a criminal trial?  The bar is set much lower in civil trials than criminal trials in terms of evidence rules.

 

That, and why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Edited Sunday at 01:00 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[discolé monade]

 these fuckers enter the chat. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, mthor said:

People tend to humor the intellectually feeble. Did he pat your head and give you a lollipop, too?

He's not humoring anything.  He could lose his mercantile license for shenanagans like that.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, 1pooh4u said:

No, that’s what you actually said because you collect junk and then brag about it like a fuckin idiot 

Then, just start buying stuff made in America.

[discolé monade]

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

The jury in this case was deliberately lied to and misled by the judge, and the prosecuter while Don and his lawyers were barely allowed to say yes or no at their own trial.

 

Edited Sunday at 01:02 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

2 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

 

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

Prove it 

Why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

[naraku360]

19 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How about the fact that this wasn't a criminal trial?  The bar is set much lower in civil trials than criminal trials in terms of evidence rules.

 

That, and why did the judge refuse Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Citations needed.

[discolé monade]

mercantile sales

[katt_goddess]

This is an attempt to distract from the Epstein Pedo-Files and cause the news cycle to waste time on that fake rebate instead of continuing to push for the release of all the files as well as continuing to call out the gop for going on their little vacation early so they wouldn't have to vote publicly on releasing the files as promised. 

Also, by referring to it as a rebate, both you and that fat lard have admitted that it's a tax on the American people and not something magically paid for by the other country. It is our money to begin with that has been illegally taken away by a fat fraud who is abusing the ability to CONSIDER leveraging tariffs by actively using them to wreck the markets, blow up the prices on everything and try to claim those graphs showing prices going up is actually a reflection on how awesome he is since his actual ratings are in the toilet. 

And yes, you just might be seeing 'Tariff' as its own individual line on every receipt soon. I saw some coding changes not that long ago and the program is slow rolling out with every new update to registers across the country that will allow that to automatically be implemented should the tariffs outpace the abilities of stores everywhere to keep up with the additional costs. This TAX will affect everything because its a TAX. There is no such thing as a 'Country of Origin' scanner to exclude anything. It will be applied to the full bill. End stop. Amazon actually said they were going to put that in their billing statements at the start of all this so that people would know exactly how much they were paying extra but the WH had a fit and threw a bunch of ketchup and made threats so that was pulled back. But now I can personally say that not only are they starting to include the tariff tax in their final bills, it's being added to those of us who do reviews as well. 

 

Summary - it's a distraction that if it ever gets to the point where he feels he HAS to, he'll do the same thing he did with the pandemic checks which is to hold them from being sent unless they all have his name splattered across them just in time for the midterms so he can try to buy stupid people's votes for his sycophantic goobers. 

Also, favorite new insult for that toddler - 'leather faced piss goblin'.

[katt_goddess]

2 hours ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

From biased judges who kept all of the evidence in his favor off the record.  Nice try.

 

If you're going to shop around, looking for a judge who had already decided on the case before any procedings have started, you can convict an elm tree of sexual assault.

Not really. 

The judge in one of those cases did allow that because Princess Tinyhands does in fact have a confirmed micro penis, they could consider sexual assault and rape with actual penetration to be two separate clauses. 

If you want to talk about biased judges, you'll need to explain why everything horrible from republicans pushing for horrible things are shopped to a single set of judges in Texas regardless of where the real mess is taking place. Or how about anything in Florida going to a bleached blond bimbo who thinks there's nothing wrong with stanning for a convicted felon and avid friend of Epstein no matter what the charges.   

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

41 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

Citation

 

 

 

Edited Sunday at 01:53 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[mthor]

50 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

He's not humoring anything.  He could lose his mercantile license for shenanagans like that.

True. I'm sure that he doesn't want you suing after you trip and aspirate the lollipop.

[katt_goddess]

Dude, your own 'citation' actually shows that she had to do more work to prove her case than he did and she won it. 

Further, his micropenis would require specialists to get a decent sample which would be used as a stalling tactic since there are no 13–14-year-olds with the credentials to get the DNA since underaged are the only things that could get enough of a response to find it in the first place. 

Either that of flipping him upside down like a goose to see where the pee happens. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

9 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

Not really. 

The judge in one of those cases did allow that because Princess Tinyhands does in fact have a confirmed micro penis, they could consider sexual assault and rape with actual penetration to be two separate clauses. 

If you want to talk about biased judges, you'll need to explain why everything horrible from republicans pushing for horrible things are shopped to a single set of judges in Texas regardless of where the real mess is taking place. Or how about anything in Florida going to a bleached blond bimbo who thinks there's nothing wrong with stanning for a convicted felon and avid friend of Epstein no matter what the charges.   

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

[katt_goddess]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

Stalling. Tactics. His lawyers could argue for months about everything from who does the collecting to where to when and then mysteriously have an issue that comes up every time the date set comes around, pushing it all back and starting all over again while the court fees continue to pile up. 

That and 

micro penis. [ font larger than actual penis ]

Edited Sunday at 02:00 AM by katt_goddess
something disappeared at posting...

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

4 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

Dude, your own 'citation' actually shows that she had to do more work to prove her case than he did and she won it. 

Further, his micropenis would require specialists to get a decent sample which would be used as a stalling tactic since there are no 13–14-year-olds with the credentials to get the DNA since underaged are the only things that could get enough of a response to find it in the first place. 

Either that of flipping him upside down like a goose to see where the pee happens. 

You're every place except on the mark.  A DNA sample could even be taken from a spent cigarette these days.  You don't need a semen sample.

[katt_goddess]

1 minute ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You're every place except on the mark.  A DNA sample could even be taken from a spent cigarette these days.  You don't need a semen sample.

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

7 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

You only regurgitated the judge's cover story, which was all conjecture and hyperbole.

An honest and unbiased judge would have simply had the stained dress compared to a known stain from Don, just like in any criminal trial.

Edited Sunday at 02:12 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

5 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

You'd need permission if you didn't want pinhead to argue to exclude. And I already explained how things can be stalled out. 

Permission from whom?

[PenguinBoss]

14 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

So, why did the judge conveniently reject Don's offer of DNA evidence?

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

2 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

1 hour ago, katt_goddess said:

This is an attempt to distract from the Epstein Pedo-Files and cause the news cycle to waste time on that fake rebate instead of continuing to push for the release of all the files as well as continuing to call out the gop for going on their little vacation early so they wouldn't have to vote publicly on releasing the files as promised. 

Also, by referring to it as a rebate, both you and that fat lard have admitted that it's a tax on the American people and not something magically paid for by the other country. It is our money to begin with that has been illegally taken away by a fat fraud who is abusing the ability to CONSIDER leveraging tariffs by actively using them to wreck the markets, blow up the prices on everything and try to claim those graphs showing prices going up is actually a reflection on how awesome he is since his actual ratings are in the toilet. 

And yes, you just might be seeing 'Tariff' as its own individual line on every receipt soon. I saw some coding changes not that long ago and the program is slow rolling out with every new update to registers across the country that will allow that to automatically be implemented should the tariffs outpace the abilities of stores everywhere to keep up with the additional costs. This TAX will affect everything because its a TAX. There is no such thing as a 'Country of Origin' scanner to exclude anything. It will be applied to the full bill. End stop. Amazon actually said they were going to put that in their billing statements at the start of all this so that people would know exactly how much they were paying extra but the WH had a fit and threw a bunch of ketchup and made threats so that was pulled back. But now I can personally say that not only are they starting to include the tariff tax in their final bills, it's being added to those of us who do reviews as well. 

 

Summary - it's a distraction that if it ever gets to the point where he feels he HAS to, he'll do the same thing he did with the pandemic checks which is to hold them from being sent unless they all have his name splattered across them just in time for the midterms so he can try to buy stupid people's votes for his sycophantic goobers. 

Also, favorite new insult for that toddler - 'leather faced piss goblin'.

Don seems to be the guy rooting for the release of Epstein's documents as well as other documents, such as the pilot's flight manifests.

[PenguinBoss]

Just now, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

You're thicker than pig shit.

If it would have cleared him, he wouldn't have waited three years to all of a sudden change his mind right before the trial started.

It's far more likely that he did it but thought he had the power to make it go away before it actually got to trial.

[The Evil Dr. Longshadow]

4 minutes ago, PenguinBoss said:

You're thicker than pig shit.

If it would have cleared him, he wouldn't have waited three years to all of a sudden change his mind right before the trial started.

It's far more likely that he did it but thought he had the power to make it go away before it actually got to trial.

Okay, so who was he supposed to give that sample to, three years earlier? 

Edited Sunday at 02:32 AM by The Evil Dr. Longshadow

[discolé monade]

[PenguinBoss]

3 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Okay, so who was he supposed to give that sample to, three years earlier? 

lol "Yeah, you're right, but do you know the specifics of the handling of DNA evidence?"

No, no, I don't. I imagine it would be done by a third party, quite possibly the person that would do the DNA testing. I don't know why you're asking, since I don't know why it would be anyone different from when her attorneys requested it to his attorneys offering it. It's not like both sides would meet in a Walgreen's parking lot and go "Here's Trump's spit in a cup."

[naraku360]

33 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

You only regurgitated the judge's cover story, which was all conjecture and hyperbole.

An honest and unbiased judge would have simply had the stained dress compared to a known stain from Don, just like in any criminal trial.

Someone is really desperate to defend a pedo with a teeny tiny penis.

[naraku360]

29 minutes ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

How convenient...

People introduce new evidence all the time at both criminal and civil trials.  The judge jusr made a lame excuse to ignore relevant information, simply because he knew it would clear Don.

Packard, look at what you're saying.

What are you defending IF you're wrong?

Like, how do you know for sure that he's not guilty?

[1pooh4u]

1 hour ago, The Evil Dr. Longshadow said:

Then, just start buying stuff made in America.

Pure idiocy