Jump to content
Survivor Sign-up Now Open! ×
UnevenEdge

Attack on Bourbon


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just downplayed to NOT a terrorist attack.

What gave this impression initially... usually only one thing qualifies as a terrorist attack and I guess they confirmed the culprit wasn't of terrorist descent so time to back peddle....why even stoke that flame without knowing for sure 

mainstream media is straight bullshit 

 

EDIT: Terrorist attack again. I remember seeing this same waffling during the Vegas Shooting. But my bad, I'm just a little on edge with this....it's weird recognizing the exact area as a place you've been shit faced hundreds of times

Edited by André Toulon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, André Toulon said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-orleans-vehicle-crash-bourbon-street-crowd-casualties-shooting/

It always makes me feel like something is being intentionally hidden from us when stories like his hit.

But I guess I'll follow this today and need to check to see if any of my people were on Bourbon last night.

So, the perp's truck wasn't rendered useless after hitting the third person?

 

I guess we should outlaw trucks right along with the guns, then.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

So, the perp's truck wasn't rendered useless after hitting the third person?

 

I guess we should outlaw trucks right along with the guns, then.

Math lesson.

 10 and 35 is less than 60 and at least 400.

Your comparison is completely invalid.

But nice try....I'm sure you thought you ate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, André Toulon said:

Math lesson.

 10 and 35 is less than 60 and at least 400.

Your comparison is completely invalid.

But nice try....I'm sure you thought you ate.

Wtf is that even supposed to mean?

 

I did see some of you idiots in here before, claiming that vehicle attacks were impossible on a large scale because the car would just crumple up like dollar store tin foil after the third hit.  Your numbers don't compute at all in this.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Wtf is that even supposed to mean?

 

I did see some of you idiots in here before, claiming that vehicle attacks were impossible on a large scale because the car would just crumple up like dollar store tin foil after the third hit.  Your numbers don't compute at all in this.

Soooooo....you have no idea who you had this argument with, but want me to continue it?🤣

Fuck off dipshit...I'm concerned with the media changing it's tune and its use of spin. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Soooooo....you have no idea who you had this argument with, but want me to continue it?🤣

Fuck off dipshit...I'm concerned with the media changing it's tune and its use of spin. 

 

I gotta see just who the perp is.  Some type of wannabe hero, out to avange people who died because their medical insurance lapsed, perhaps?

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, smiradenius said:

I gotta see just who the perp is.  Some type of wannabe hero, out to avange people who died because their medical insurance lapsed, perhaps?

Well, while you're over here in imagination land, I'ma just watch this live feed. But you have fun whipping yourself into a frenzy over shit you don't know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Well, while you're over here in imagination land, I'ma just watch this live feed. But you have fun whipping yourself into a frenzy over shit you don't know.

That's easily remedied.  News will come in as the week progresses and I'll stay tuned in.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, smiradenius said:

So, the perp's truck wasn't rendered useless after hitting the third person?

 

I guess we should outlaw trucks right along with the guns, then.

You are the dumbest person I have ever encountered. Good job making yourself look ridiculous. 

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

You are the dumbest person I have ever encountered. Good job making yourself look ridiculous. 

How does that make me look foolish?  There had been a twenty five page thread with the majority of you idiots claiming that vehicular attacks couldn't possibly hurt more than three people in a crowd, because I'm supposed to believe that 1.5 tons of steel in rapid motion are no match for the human body.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

How does that make me look foolish?  There had been a twenty five page thread with the majority of you idiots claiming that vehicular attacks couldn't possibly hurt more than three people in a crowd, because I'm supposed to believe that 1.5 tons of steel in rapid motion are no match for the human body.

Prove it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

How does that make me look foolish?  There had been a twenty five page thread with the majority of you idiots claiming that vehicular attacks couldn't possibly hurt more than three people in a crowd, because I'm supposed to believe that 1.5 tons of steel in rapid motion are no match for the human body.

You’re looking foolish because no one ever made the claims about a truck crumbling after hitting 3 bodies and if they had go find the thread. You further look like a clown because you’re possibly bringing up something no one currently here ever argued or said and the icing on the cake? You being a complete moron by turning this tragedy into some argument about gun control. We know what you’re doing you fool 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, smiradenius said:

Wtf is that even supposed to mean?

 

I did see some of you idiots in here before, claiming that vehicle attacks were impossible on a large scale because the car would just crumple up like dollar store tin foil after the third hit.  Your numbers don't compute at all in this.

Tell me what cars are made for and then tell me what guns are made for. Last I checked, we don't fight wars by hurling cars at one another.  
There are around 480 smoking related deaths in the U.S every year. Maybe it's high time we ban cigarettes.

A tradedy just occurred and you're coming in here some some stupid ass false equivalency bullshit that has nothing to do with the thread.

Edited by Sieg67
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1pooh4u said:

You’re looking foolish because no one ever made the claims about a truck crumbling after hitting 3 bodies and if they had go find the thread. You further look like a clown because you’re possibly bringing up something no one currently here ever argued or said and the icing on the cake? You being a complete moron by turning this tragedy into some argument about gun control. We know what you’re doing you fool 

 

That's funny because the the thread I'm referring to had in fact been about gun control and it erupted into circus pandemonium when I suggested that cars could be more dangerous than semiautomatic rifles and sarcastically asked why there's no push for radical vehicle control.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sieg67 said:

Tell me what cars are made for and then tell me what guns are made for. Last I checked, we don't fight wars by hurling cars at one another.  
There are around 480 smoking related deaths in the U.S every year. Maybe it's high time we ban cigarettes.

A tradedy just occurred and you're coming in here some some stupid ass false equivalency bullshit that has nothing to do with the thread.

Apparently, cars are now being weoponized none the less.  You’re going to see copycat offenses on the rise in the next five years.  That's the current trajectory.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, smiradenius said:

Apparently, cars are now being weoponized none the less.  You’re going to see copycat offenses on the rise in the next five years.  That's the current trajectory.

Thank God you can neither legally drive or own firearms.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sieg67 said:

Wait, what?  Is he a felon?

No, seeing a shrink for any reason at all disqualifies people from owning firearms in New Jersey,  even just for ADD or bipolar disorder.  The primary reason is that no psychiatrist will ever risk his license on endorsing the patient. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

So you can't prove it because you're lying.

This doesn't prove I'm lying so much as that once again somebody like Pooh has decided to dial it back and erase it.  Same as ever, when little inconvenient truths pop up.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

What's going to stop me from getting the license?

I don't have a fishing license.  That means I cannot legally fish in a public place.
You do not have a drivers license.  That means you cannot legally drive.

Once you get a license, you can legally drive on public roads.  Until then...

Edited by Sieg67
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

This doesn't prove I'm lying so much as that once again somebody like Pooh has decided to dial it back and erase it.  Same as ever, when little inconvenient truths pop up.

What did I dial back or erase? I can say w 100% certainty that I did nothing of the sort

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

That's funny because the the thread I'm referring to had in fact been about gun control and it erupted into circus pandemonium when I suggested that cars could be more dangerous than semiautomatic rifles and sarcastically asked why there's no push for radical vehicle control.

It’s harder to get a driver’s license and a CDL w endorsements than it is to get a semiautomatic weapon with dozens of rounds per clip you dolt

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sieg67 said:

I don't have a fishing license.  That means I cannot legally fish in a public place.
You do not have a license.  That means you cannot legally drive.

Once you get a license, you can legally drive on public roads.  Until then...

Again,  WHAT is going to stop you from getting a fishing license, or me getting a driver license?  No barrier whatsoever,  either way.

  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

You can talk for thirty eight years without coming to a point.

I'm not 38, but looks like I touched a nerve about the license and firearms.

Time to split this thread full of your stupid brain rot takes, I think. Jesus Christ.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Again,  WHAT is going to stop you from getting a fishing license, or me getting a driver license?  No barrier whatsoever,  either way.

Can you legally drive right now?  This exact moment.


Yes or no answer. 

Edited by Sieg67
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

This doesn't prove I'm lying so much as that once again somebody like Pooh has decided to dial it back and erase it.  Same as ever, when little inconvenient truths pop up.

So, it doesn't exist and you need to blame someone else for you saying a thing you couldn't prove.

Stfu

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said:

They found an ISIS flag on the truck 

Oh, my goodness...

Go to bed thinking about that tonight. 

 

Fox News is likely to obtain a lot more information in the coming months and you will end up hearing or reading it.

 

So, I don't have to be in this thread anymore.  I won't be the one saying any of it.  It's all somebody else's point to make.

 

Bar Har har!

Edited by smiradenius
  • D'oh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Not true at all.

Yes it is true.  First off to get a driver’s license you need to take a written test to get a permit. No such exam exists to get a firearm. So you’re already wrong and sounding stupid 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Oh, my goodness...

Go to bed thinking about that tonight. 

 

Fox News is likely to obtain a lot more information in the coming months and you will end up hearing or reading it.

 

So, I don't have to be in this thread anymore.  I'm won't be the one saying any of it.  It's all somebody else's point to make.

 

Bar Har har!

You are an idiot. That post of yours is dumb from first line to last

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Oh, my goodness...

Go to bed thinking about that tonight. 

 

Fox News is likely to obtain a lot more information in the coming months and you will end up hearing or reading it.

 

So, I don't have to be in this thread anymore.  I'm won't be the one saying any of it.  It's all somebody else's point to make.

 

Bar Har har!

200w(26)(20).gif.94ff128bac63d01d8e817ced74e6d006.gif

Keep MC Gee Gee's name out of your fucking mouth!

will-smith(1).gif.98a40804dfbc135d0c33cd69f0bdb4b0.gif

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Jesus, tell you what. Can I have my thread moved to the secret space where we don't have to see this clown. I think everyone else in this thread can see it besides him.

A shame we can't discuss vehicular homicide and possible terrorists without this dumbass vying for guns he can't even hold correctly 

9 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

buddy...get your ass back in here

 

I'm watching the live feed but it's looping now so I came back just to see this dude diarrhea walking in my thread.

Pretty sure the guy he was arguing with was Nabs because I remember him saying something like a car can't liquify 100 people in 20 seconds like an auto weapon or some shit, but I think it was he and bucket after that dude drove a sports car through protesters....nobody tell him that nabs can't see this and he's looking for a fight with a guy who was permed

 

If packlame had anything to do with it, no one was even talking to him and he was just in the way. 

Edited by André Toulon
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...