Jump to content
UnevenEdge

world of deja/my novelssssss


fuggnificent

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Ginguy said:

Creation/dissemination of obscene material is a felony offense under 18 USC 1465.

Tax evasion, which is forgetting to include a W-2 in your tax forms is a felony. Ask Wesley....

You ripping off 50 Shades of Fail should be a felony on general principle....

 

 

 

you do know 50 shades is a rip off of twilight dont ya? so its free season

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SorceressPol said:

Ugh, I've heard horror stories like that, but it's more fucked up when the organizers ignore predatory behavior.

The club with the Jesus impersonator sounds fun as heck.

The entire community is happy the guy was bought out and can never come to the events again because they are really popular. And the Jesus impersonator event are great. Especially at the end of the night when everyone was leaving because the downstairs was being used as a more traditional club. So you have all these young kids dressed up nice coming out while a bunch of people dressed in leather, corsets, spandex, latex, and all other kinds of fetish wear are mingling about. The looks on their faces are priceless.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, fuggnificent said:

you do know 50 shades is a rip off of twilight dont ya? so its free season

You do know that 50 shades of grey isn't a healthy BDSM relationship. It is a very unhealthy abusive relationship between the blandest person to ever bland and her rich stalker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ginguy said:

Creation/dissemination of obscene material is a felony offense under 18 USC 1465.

Tax evasion, which is forgetting to include a W-2 in your tax forms is a felony. Ask Wesley....

You ripping off 50 Shades of Fail should be a felony on general principle....

 

 

 

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity

The U.S. Supreme Court established the test that judges and juries use to determine whether matter is obscene in three major cases: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 24-25 (1973); Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 300-02, 309 (1977); and Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 500-01 (1987).  The three-pronged Miller test is as follows:

  1. Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interests (i.e., an erotic, lascivious, abnormal, unhealthy, degrading, shameful, or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion);
  2. Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way (i.e., ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, masturbation, excretory functions, lewd exhibition of the genitals, or sado-masochistic sexual abuse); and
  3. Whether a reasonable person finds that the matter, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

          Any material that satisfies this three-pronged test may be found obscene.  

Books get a pretty big pass, but art depicting kids and erotica can get you jacked up. There's your free lesson, neo-nazi.

Edited by SorceressPol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SorceressPol said:

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity

The U.S. Supreme Court established the test that judges and juries use to determine whether matter is obscene in three major cases: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 24-25 (1973); Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 300-02, 309 (1977); and Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 500-01 (1987).  The three-pronged Miller test is as follows:

  1. Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interests (i.e., an erotic, lascivious, abnormal, unhealthy, degrading, shameful, or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion);
  2. Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way (i.e., ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, masturbation, excretory functions, lewd exhibition of the genitals, or sado-masochistic sexual abuse); and
  3. Whether a reasonable person finds that the matter, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

          Any material that satisfies this three-pronged test may be found obscene.  

Books get a pretty big pass, but art depicting kids and erotica can get you jacked up. There's your free lesson, neo-nazi.

He knows it when he sees it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ginguy said:

Creation/dissemination of obscene material is a felony offense under 18 USC 1465.

Tax evasion, which is forgetting to include a W-2 in your tax forms is a felony. Ask Wesley....

You ripping off 50 Shades of Fail should be a felony on general principle....

 

 

 

Tax evasion, distributing obscene material... Hey, is beating one's wife a felony?

How about lying under oath?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, fuggnificent said:

i googled it. google says shes 18 so no need for a dissertation. im good 

God damnit, I recall in the XAV story I looked at Jubilee's license and she was in fact under 20, but still above the legal age of consent, which was the only way Xavier would allow me hang out with the group.

Huh, that does make me sound creepy, doesn't it?

Eh, whatever, more barely legal for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...