Jump to content
UnevenEdge

No voter fraud, eh?


1938 Packard

Recommended Posts

Here's what happens when you let people vote under fake names.  This is why I.D. should be required at the pols.  It has nothing to do with bigotry or preventing minorities from voting.  It's not a pol tax.  It has a lot more to do with preventing non existent people from voting.  Here's the proof:

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-05/california-has-11-counties-more-registered-voters-voting-age-citizens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that's pretty fucked up. Probably due to rich people with multiple homes and people who have since moved being registered in multiple cities/states, but still looks horrible on the part of California for not maintaining their voter rolls and letting it get to that point.

 

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/us/politics/trump-cabinet-family-voter-registration.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that's pretty fucked up. Probably due to rich people with multiple homes and people who have since moved being registered in multiple cities/states, but still looks horrible on the part of California for not maintaining their voter rolls and letting it get to that point.

 

Los Angeles has a voter roll larger than over half the states in the union, so it's not exactly a surprise that the registrar's records are out of date.  It could easily be that far out after just two election cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means, to me, that someone is not doing their job correctly. I know the actual voter count vs. the voter roll (voter registry) in California is off, because they have more voters than what they have registered. Still, they should be able to keep up with it. Then again, I don't think they digitize or computerize their voter roll in California like they do here in Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means, to me, that someone is not doing their job correctly. I know the actual voter count vs. the voter roll (voter registry) in California is off, because they have more voters than what they have registered. Still, they should be able to keep up with it. Then again, I don't think they digitize or computerize their voter roll in California like they do here in Texas.

 

I'm pretty sure it's databased, but who knows how antiquated the system is?  Los Angeles County is so populous, shortfalls in funding is almost guaranteed, and there's no substitute for man hours when it comes to maintaining accurate databases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...