Haven't you made this same thread 20 times and wound up unanimously rejected every single time?
Don't answer that, it's rhetorical. We already know the answer: Yes.
It doesn't matter if it "can". Technology isn't developed over night. Just because it can't do x, y, or z now does not mean it will never be developed enough to replace senile old geezers with superiority complexes.
I'm surprised you liked Steins;Gate. Your taste is routinely terrible, so wouldn't expect you to like excellence.
Haven't watched Your Name yet, though. So.... that's all.
That's how I am with shrooms. They're great and all but I feel like I pee on myself whenever I go to the bathroom. Haven't seen the Bob's Burgers ep, though.
And you're still here dragging out he discussion even after I clearly presented a conclusion. Which is only about nothing because your side lost. ::]::
And you're only in here because you're trying to fuck with me. If it were any other user, you would've ignored the thread. So.... ::spin::
The other day I got a cookie that was supposed to be eaten in 5ths and just ate the whole thing.
That was a terrible idea and I'd probably do it again.
But the industry is the production and commerce of the product. The product's quality is irrelevant to the functionality of the industry so long as consumers are still buying and companies can still produce. A more cogent question would be "How did Prohibition Era ruin the industry standards?" Bam! Fixed. No more confusion.
Opinion doesn't come before using the word in ways that make sense.
Somebody should write a book about a senile janitor who thinks he's a scientist and does stand up comedy bits where he mistakes the boos for a positive response.