Repost

[André Toulon]

Sigh, we're still doing this.

Identifying what you TRIED to do was simple, the fact of the matter is that you did not do it....even sans circle, this is not what you drew and in no situation, class, work or otherwise would the shit you drew be accepted. Spidey sense is nonsense. But you won't ever concede that....you will continue to try to sell the joke of a narrative that what you posted is acceptable. 

It can be arrows or squiggles....no, Packard....it can't. What you drew was stupid. 

I'm done with this now since even the biggest idiot can see that what you drew is not the same and not even correctly placed to give you a pass.

[André Toulon]

Honestly, there's a much bigger problem with that pic but as I said, I don't want to address it because you might learn something, I swear it killing me not to bring it up but there's no way I'm pulling that thread

[smiradenius]

22 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Sigh, we're still doing this.

Identifying what you TRIED to do was simple, the fact of the matter is that you did not do it....even sans circle, this is not what you drew and in no situation, class, work or otherwise would the shit you drew be accepted. Spidey sense is nonsense. But you won't ever concede that....you will continue to try to sell the joke of a narrative that what you posted is acceptable. 

It can be arrows or squiggles....no, Packard....it can't. What you drew was stupid. 

I'm done with this now since even the biggest idiot can see that what you drew is not the same and not even correctly placed to give you a pass.

Stfu.  There is MORE than one way to draw the symbols and they will in fact have slight variations from one region to the next.  Since you are so hopelessly obsessed with the notion that there can be only one, just because you Googled something and got one specific result shows that you're not an engineer at all and you don't know any more than I do on the subject.

 

Okay.  Show me the circle in here.

 

Tell me whether the circuit is open or closed.

 

http://cmra.rec.ri.cmu.edu/products/electronicsv2/basic_components/what_is_an_led/2/ext1.html

Edited Sunday at 07:29 PM by smiradenius

[André Toulon]

Now you really think it's about the circle....dafuq🤣. Didn't you already hurt your back. Workman's comp is going to cook your ass when they see you carrying these goalposts.

And no Packard, just like anything else, I refused to be quizzed by an idiot. But I will be interested if you show me a region.... anywhere will be fine, that those lightning bolts are used.

An LED sans arrows indicating light is just a D. That one's for free ...but I think you know that but won't say it because it bends your stupid ass over and you love your circular arguments.

But as I said, WDH.

[smiradenius]

2 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Now you really think it's about the circle....dafuq🤣. Didn't you already hurt your back. Workman's comp is going to cook your ass when they see you carrying these goalposts.

And no Packard, just like anything else, I refused to be quizzed by an idiot. But I will be interested if you show me a region.... anywhere will be fine, that those lightning bolts are used.

An LED sans arrows indicating light is just a D. That one's for free ...but I think you know that but won't say it because it bends your stupid ass over and you love your circular arguments.

But as I said, WDH.

Oh, and didn't I just tell you, repeatedly, that the arrows or wavy lines are to distinguish between an LED and a diode?

 

Now, you're parroting it back to me and c claiming that's YOUR statement. 

 

Pathetic.

[André Toulon]

1 minute ago, smiradenius said:

Oh, and didn't I just tell you, repeatedly, that the arrows or wavy lines are to distinguish between an LED and a diode?

 

Now, you're parroting it back to me and c claiming that's YOUR statement. 

 

Pathetic.

JFC, the wavy lines DON'T MEAN SHIT. Stop trying to make that dog walk...wtf is wrong with you. 

[discolé monade]

lol

LOL

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL 

you're a bitch. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL 

@[classic swim] ded. screaming. then ded. 

 

Edited Sunday at 07:55 PM by discolé monade
damn mean bumpy machine

[smiradenius]

7 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

JFC, the wavy lines DON'T MEAN SHIT. Stop trying to make that dog walk...wtf is wrong with you. 

Tadaaa...

https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/consider-circuit-led-powered-5-v-dc-voltage-assume-led-ltl-4263-lite-led-provided-ee-230-l-q111778098

 

So, every single time you post anything in my threads, regardless of the subject, you are going to see this url, fish slapping you.

Edited Sunday at 07:57 PM by smiradenius

[naraku360]

8 hours ago, André Toulon said:

Ok....I'm not sure what to do with the MIA chick thing. I know what I would do of it were any number of other people, but I'm not really inclined to lay into you like I would any average schmo, but focusing on the AI usage, do you have any semi-finalized work where you've used it as you've intended. I'm going to assume no, but I also assumed you've at least payed with it just to see if what you want to do is possible.

Nah, I'm still learning the coding part and don't have any kind of crew. It's not something I can really explain as far as the lady friend and seriousness goes, I don't think that I could understand it without going through whatever this shit is. Realistically, I shouldn't put much into the possibility of even seeing her again, but then a huge chunk of my ideas crumble if I don't.

It's only recently that I've had the physical capacity to potentially handle projects seriously. The problem comes from her amd I having discussed making something together for quite a while and didn't have the time/energy. We had been talking about a premise that would hinge on both of us writing separate halves, and even then, I'd need her input to make my end align with hers.

It's just in flux since, from any logical standpoint, I've been ghosted. But I'm pretty sure there are illogical emotions for both of us in the mix and all I can hope for is that she does really value me as much as she's expressed. I know I should at this point resign to being alone and working on it by myself, but a lot of it was for her and demands her to be there, so I don't actually know what I actually want if I don't still have her as a part of my life.

I guess I put my eggs in one basket, and as usual it's not as unlikely that I've been ditched as I want to believe. I knew her for 8 years, it would be 10 if she ever comes back.

8 hours ago, André Toulon said:

But what I'm hearing is you're writing stories or something of the sort and want to give it visual representation without involving other people who may take advantage of you, or just never actually take the project seriously and leave it unfinished. If that's the case, I understand why you would like to lean on AI to fill in the gaps where you lack....But I guess I can't in good faith just say it's ok due to my limited knowledge on how AI truly learns and operates.

This is the primary type of thing I'm interested in. It doesn't seem especially easy, it's just a method that de-emphasizes the processes I'm not as interested in and lets me use footage I might actually be able to produce with poor eyesight and a bad back since it mostly needs a green screen and some knowledge of filmmaking, which I have a bit of.

They used existing animation to teach the machine to animate over live action. It's not using the original animation. It's just converting entirely original footage into an animated format with the influence from a specific source that they publicly credit. Most of the work is done by humans, though. Just not the animation itself.

Edited Sunday at 08:18 PM by naraku360

[smiradenius]

This one's not an Ai.  It's not even a fried egg.  It's a dragon's eye agate.

[naraku360]

2 hours ago, smiradenius said:

I'd have to see one of those magical places that have stuff levitating above them.   I'd have to see any building at all, whether irl or on the cover of a science fiction novel that looks one hundred percent identical to what I posted. 

 

Anyway, Google Images shows what a natural bridge really looks like.  There are none in my post.  They are columns and buildings, not natural bridges.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=natural+bridge+state+park&sca_esv=deba1d0118d8a222&sxsrf=ADLYWIIOidO_ACttNvSD3rR_eG13dzqm_g:1732476927400&source=hp&ei=_39DZ_z0FrzJkPIP0IWK0Ao&oq=natural+bri&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciC25hdHVyYWwgYnJpKgIIADIIEAAYgAQYsQMyCBAAGIAEGLEDMggQABiABBixAzIIEAAYgAQYsQMyCBAAGIAEGLEDSME2UO8FWLUrcAB4AJABAJgB1wGgAdoOqgEGMC4xMS4xuAEByAEA-AEBmAIMoALlD6gCBcICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgQQIxgnwgILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwHCAgUQABiABMICDhAAGIAEGLEDGIMBGIoFmAOeAZIHBjAuMTEuMaAH0ig&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img&udm=2

[smiradenius]

Just now, naraku360 said:

How is that even relevant?  I'm not talking to you.  That's for Katt to answer.

[naraku360]

3 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

How is that even relevant?  I'm not talking to you.  That's for Katt to answer.

That is a cat.

[André Toulon]

38 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Tadaaa...

https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/consider-circuit-led-powered-5-v-dc-voltage-assume-led-ltl-4263-lite-led-provided-ee-230-l-q111778098

 

So, every single time you post anything in my threads, regardless of the subject, you are going to see this url, fish slapping you.

You tried, a for effort but that's still not wtf you drew. So you can parade it around if you like but there is a glaring difference, and it still took you 5 years to even find something that remotely looks like the shit you posted

[smiradenius]

51 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

That is a cat.

Certainly not Katt from this board.

[smiradenius]

48 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

You tried, a for effort but that's still not wtf you drew. So you can parade it around if you like but there is a glaring difference, and it still took you 5 years to even find something that remotely looks like the shit you posted

The LED there is PRECISELY  what I drew.  This is focused on the LED, not the entire circuit.  Did you or did you not claim that under no circumstances do wavy lines appear above an LED?  Thanks for playing. 

Edited Sunday at 09:27 PM by smiradenius

[André Toulon]

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

Nah, I'm still learning the coding part and don't have any kind of crew. It's not something I can really explain as far as the lady friend and seriousness goes, I don't think that I could understand it without going through whatever this shit is. Realistically, I shouldn't put much into the possibility of even seeing her again, but then a huge chunk of my ideas crumble if I don't.

It's only recently that I've had the physical capacity to potentially handle projects seriously. The problem comes from her amd I having discussed making something together for quite a while and didn't have the time/energy. We had been talking about a premise that would hinge on both of us writing separate halves, and even then, I'd need her input to make my end align with

 

They used existing animation to teach the machine to animate over live action. It's not using the original animation. It's just converting entirely original footage into an animated format with the influence from a specific source that they publicly credit. Most of the work is done by humans, though. Just not the animation itself.

Well you don't really have to sell me on its use or how little it's used as far as I'm concerned, But I would be interested in seeing it...

I really want to learn 3D animation and while I know like a small bit about editing, there's no way I could do what I want without tutelage, so I just live vicariously through others....90% of what I watch on YouTube not counting TFS is 3D animated shows and I love when the creators show their process....kind of a...not guilty pleasure, more like envious awe and respect.

[katt_goddess]

2 hours ago, smiradenius said:

Show me the books, whether mirrored or not.

I have 3,000 physical books in my personal library on top of the likely close to 1,000,000 other books I've read over the course of my lifetime. I've also been snagged more than a few times at Cons to give feedback on cover options for upcoming novels.

But sure I'll get right on that as opposed to you proving that the AI-generated images you've been posting weren't generated from analyzing/ripping elements from pre-existing images. 

[discolé monade]

48 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

You tried, a for effort but that's still not wtf you drew. So you can parade it around if you like but there is a glaring difference, and it still took you 5 years to even find something that remotely looks like the shit you posted

that homework help is quite a platform. 

j/s.

[smiradenius]

2 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

I have 3,000 physical books in my personal library on top of the likely close to 1,000,000 other books I've read over the course of my lifetime. I've also been snagged more than a few times at Cons to give feedback on cover options for upcoming novels.

But sure I'll get right on that as opposed to you proving that the AI-generated images you've been posting weren't generated from analyzing/ripping elements from pre-existing images. 

Show me one.

[naraku360]

8 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Certainly not Katt from this board.

 

[André Toulon]

2 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

The LED there is PRECISELY  what I drew.  This is focused on the LED, not the entire circuit.  Thanks for playing. 

Smfh....if you really believe that, then there's no help. But do yourself a favor and Google precisely. That's not what's on that paper of yours

[katt_goddess]

1 minute ago, smiradenius said:

Show me one.

[smiradenius]

3 minutes ago, katt_goddess said:

By the way, these search results show what a natural bridge looks like and there are NONE in my bedroom post.  They are columns and structures that STILL don't match anything in a sci fi novel.

https://www.google.com/search?q=natural+bridge+state+park&sca_esv=bfdfbc021b8553a9&sxsrf=ADLYWIJmwVixv-HpGNvTDmBmHi3jMFsosg:1732483823869&source=hp&ei=75pDZ5G1M5zOkPIPj7bSSQ&oq=nat&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciA25hdCoCCAAyBBAjGCcyCBAAGIAEGLEDMggQABiABBixAzIIEAAYgAQYsQMyBRAAGIAESPsWUOwIWIMQcAB4AJABAJgBpQGgAacEqgEDMC40uAEByAEA-AEBmAIEoALiBKgCBcICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAZgDtgGSBwMwLjSgB-MV&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img&udm=2

Probably not even in all your quintillions of books.

 

Edited Sunday at 09:34 PM by smiradenius

[André Toulon]

13 minutes ago, discolé monade said:

that homework help is quite a platform. 

j/s.

Literally shit posted by other "students", but it does have the Diode symbol at the end..... you draw lightning bolts in class without the literal fucking diode indicator at the tip, that shit is getting marked wrong. But he tried hard to find the one image that he at least believes agrees with him. He can actually Google that the symbol must be present or it's nonsense. 

Edited Sunday at 09:40 PM by André Toulon

[smiradenius]

6 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Literally shit posted by other "students", but it does have the Diode symbol at the end..... you draw lightning bolts in class without the literal fucking diode indicator at the tip, that shit is getting marked wrong. But he tried hard to find the one image that he at least believes agrees with him. He can actually Google that the symbol must be present or it's nonsense. 

Who is moving that goal post, now?

 

You said, "Oh well that evidence doesn't count because it's printed in a book that a student was using."

[André Toulon]

59 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

Who is moving that goal post, now?

 

You said, "Oh well that evidence doesn't count because it's printed in a book that a student was using."

No I didn't, I said at least he drew the symbol correctly...which you just refuse to admit you didn't do. You just pretend to not see the same thing on every pic you posted that's not in yours.

[smiradenius]

1 minute ago, André Toulon said:

No I didn't, I said at least he drew the symbol correctly...which you just refuse to admit you didn't do. You just pretend to not see the same thing on every pic you posted that's not in yours.

How is mine any different?  The wavy lines don't have tips?  So, I guess what you're really looking for is whether this is an LED or an LSD, which would make you correct.  But that wasn't your original point.

[Insipid]

This was AI generated.

[André Toulon]

Omfg, wtf are you ta....

You got it ....

This was for Packard 

Edited Sunday at 11:00 PM by André Toulon

[smiradenius]

2 minutes ago, Insipid said:

This was AI generated.

It's a lady, snoring.

[André Toulon]

8 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

It's a lady, snoring.

Close again 

[smiradenius]

33 minutes ago, André Toulon said:

Close again 

It's not anybody I know and she's not famous.  Google Image Search draws a blank.

 

[katt_goddess]

2 hours ago, smiradenius said:

By the way, these search results show what a natural bridge looks like and there are NONE in my bedroom post.  They are columns and structures that STILL don't match anything in a sci fi novel.

https://www.google.com/search?q=natural+bridge+state+park&sca_esv=bfdfbc021b8553a9&sxsrf=ADLYWIJmwVixv-HpGNvTDmBmHi3jMFsosg:1732483823869&source=hp&ei=75pDZ5G1M5zOkPIPj7bSSQ&oq=nat&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciA25hdCoCCAAyBBAjGCcyCBAAGIAEGLEDMggQABiABBixAzIIEAAYgAQYsQMyBRAAGIAESPsWUOwIWIMQcAB4AJABAJgBpQGgAacEqgEDMC40uAEByAEA-AEBmAIEoALiBKgCBcICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAZgDtgGSBwMwLjSgB-MV&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img&udm=2

Probably not even in all your quintillions of books.

 

I think you should not be allowed to use AI generated images if you don't even know how they actually work to create those 'not in my bedroom' images. 

[katt_goddess]

4 minutes ago, smiradenius said:

It's not anybody I know and she's not famous.  Google Image Search draws a blank.

 

Don't f-ing google that. 

And Insipid - don't you dare. Not even behind a spoiler. That's toaster oven pork chop levels of gross and we've already had that. >.<

[smiradenius]

Just now, katt_goddess said:

I think you should not be allowed to use AI generated images if you don't even know how they actually work to create those 'not in my bedroom' images. 

That picture is not in the bedroom post.  Try again.

[smiradenius]

1 minute ago, katt_goddess said:

Don't f-ing google that. 

And Insipid - don't you dare. Not even behind a spoiler. That's toaster oven pork chop levels of gross and we've already had that. >.<

Bottom line it.  Am I supposedly associated with that picture or something?

[Insipid]

1 minute ago, smiradenius said:

Bottom line it.  Am I supposedly associated with that picture or something?

Yes.

[smiradenius]

4 minutes ago, Insipid said:

Yes.

Great... somebody sends up a random Ai shot of whoever that's supposed to be, most likely somebody who doesn't even exist and then tries to tie it to me just because she's fat or whatever the defect is perceived to be.  That shows the low IQ quality of people haunting these boards.

Edited Sunday at 11:59 PM by smiradenius

[Insipid]

1 minute ago, smiradenius said:

Great... somebody sends up a random Ai shot of whoever that's supposed to be, most likely somebody who doesn't even exist and then tries to tie to me just because she's fat or whatever the defect is perceived to be.  That shows the low IQ quality of people haunting these boards.

The lady doth project too much, methinks!

[Insipid]

[smiradenius]

1 minute ago, Insipid said:

Well, you're pretty good, Old Son... but sit down on that chair right there and let me show you how it's done!  Fire on the mountain, run boy run!

[smiradenius]

Well... Looky here...

 

If I tell Ai to draw a face, it's not going to randomly select from the twelve or thirteen billion portraits that clog the web, and hand it to me.  That's not how Ai works.  What I'm getting is an approximation, based on data that had been programmed into it by the software engineer on the subject of what a basic face should look like in terms of such things as where the eyes should be in relation to the nose and ears, or the general shape of a pair of lips.  

This is the real reason that sometimes, there are flubs in the result, such as two noses.  It knows the minimum basics, but has a difficulty in making variations when told to do so.

 

Therefore, this clown is a one of a kind original, made by the Ai, with some input from me.  It's very much the same as when I pay a live artist at a convention to draw or sketch something for me.  In either case, I am not the true artist.  I'm simply supplying an idea or concept, and having it brought to a visual depiction.  The only thing original or creative on my part is the idea.

Edited yesterday at 02:43 AM by smiradenius

[[classic swim]]

You’re still going! Wow!

[scoobdog]

4 hours ago, smiradenius said:

It's a lady, snoring.

I’ll bet you get a lot of that, Emphysema Man.

[smiradenius]

1 hour ago, [classic swim] said:

You’re still going! Wow!

 

[naraku360]

1 hour ago, smiradenius said:

Well... Looky here...

 

If I tell Ai to draw a face, it's not going to randomly select from the twelve or thirteen billion portraits that clog the web, and hand it to me.  That's not how Ai works.  What I'm getting is an approximation, based on data that had been programmed into it by the software engineer on the subject of what a basic face should look like in terms of such things as where the eyes should be in relation to the nose and ears, or the general shape of a pair of lips.  

This is the real reason that sometimes, there are flubs in the result, such as two noses.  It knows the minimum basics, but has a difficulty in making variations when told to do so.

 

Therefore, this clown is a one of a kind original, made by the Ai, with some input from me.  It's very much the same as when I pay a live artist at a convention to draw or sketch something for me.  In either case, I am not the true artist.  I'm simply supplying an idea or concept, and having it brought to a visual depiction.  The only thing original or creative on my part is the idea.

 

[smiradenius]

4 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

 

And this ads nothing of any value.  Bravo.

[naraku360]

Just now, smiradenius said:

And this ads nothing of any value.  Bravo.

*adds

[smiradenius]

21 minutes ago, naraku360 said:

*adds

Bully for you.  Do you have any more farts to spray?

Edited yesterday at 04:58 AM by smiradenius