Jump to content
UnevenEdge

we must do a rollback until we're back in the Victorian era


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Zenigundam said:

That'd be cool to go back to HS. Not the Victorian age, I'm not a coat and hat and no video games or TV kinda guy

the coat and the hat is dapper. lets just do that again and keep TV and video games. we don't want to upset Lord Nanna

Posted
16 minutes ago, tsar4 said:

I think I'd rather have the '40s.  Cool cars & clothes.

Barely anybody from the 40s is even alive. Plus, I have LA Noire on PS3 and those cars were awful!! 🎅

Posted
41 minutes ago, Zenigundam said:

Barely anybody from the 40s is even alive. Plus, I have LA Noire on PS3 and those cars were awful!! 🎅

image.png.2363f94960da96c543b01c5e9b000823.png

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Mini_Ghost said:

what? you can have an old car anyway. and Victorian era style is better

No central air, only outhouses or chamberpots (no tp), no deodorants, etc. 

Posted
Just now, Mini_Ghost said:

didn't they have plumbing? I thought they did

The rich did. I could do Victorian era. 

Mid to late 1800's London would have been cool to have seen.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, midnight said:

The rich did. I could do Victorian era. 

Mid to late 1800's London would have been cool to have seen.

the main things I like about the Victorian era is the clothing style and the fact people were more concerned about occultism

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Mini_Ghost said:

the main things I like about the Victorian era is the clothing style and the fact people were more concerned about occultism

To have met people like Darwin or Dickens would have been awesome. 

To try to catch Jack the Ripper. Trying to find actual ghosts during that time period would have been very cool.

1800's London was a creepy and cool place.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, midnight said:

The rich did. I could do Victorian era. 

Mid to late 1800's London would have been cool to have seen.

If you could see it.  Lots of coal burning in those days.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, midnight said:

Mid to late 1800's London would have been cool to have seen.

Hell no. Life definitely sucked back then, and the girls weren't hot, and they thought simple shit was amazing entertainment like they thought looking through a pair of binoculars was the equivalent of playing Red Dead Redemption 2. 💁‍♂️

Posted
Just now, Zenigundam said:

Yeah you drive that and see how many legal age teen women are lining up for a ride in that thing! 🐧

1) I wouldn't have anything to do with a teenager - they're clueless outside of their little worlds.

2) Still a far cry more than on a city bus with you.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, tsar4 said:

1) I wouldn't have anything to do with a teenager - they're clueless outside of their little worlds.

2) Still a far cry more than on a city bus with you.

You do realize that buses and subway trains are hot spots for a lot of legal age honeys... 🙆‍♂️

Posted
4 minutes ago, midnight said:

To have met people like Darwin or Dickens would have been awesome. 

To try to catch Jack the Ripper. Trying to find actual ghosts during that time period would have been very cool.

1800's London was a creepy and cool place.

you know Queen Victoria had the first ever celebrity stalker. he stole her underwear

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Zenigundam said:

Hell no. Life definitely sucked back then, and the girls weren't hot, and they thought simple shit was amazing entertainment like they thought looking through a pair of binoculars was the equivalent of playing Red Dead Redemption 2. 💁‍♂️

I am sure there were beautiful women around then. They didn't just pop up in the 20th century.

And if simple things made women happy then, then that is nothing to complain about. 

I wish all I had to do was hand disco some binoculars to look through and she'd be happy. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, midnight said:

I am sure there were beautiful women around then. They didn't just pop up in the 20th century.

 

Uh yeah no. Just look at the portraits and photographs from back then. Hot women didn't start popping up until about like forty years ago from what I gather. 🐰

Posted
4 minutes ago, midnight said:

I am sure there were beautiful women around then. They didn't just pop up in the 20th century.

And if simple things made women happy then, then that is nothing to complain about. 

I wish all I had to do was hand disco some binoculars to look through and she'd be happy. 

Zeni would like it. 16 was marrying age back them

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Zenigundam said:

Uh yeah no. Just look at the portraits and photographs from back then. Hot women didn't start popping up until about like forty years ago from what I gather. 🐰

you're an idiot Zeni. there have been hot women since day one

Posted
1 minute ago, Zenigundam said:

Uh yeah no. Just look at the portraits and photographs from back then. Hot women didn't start popping up until about like forty years ago from what I gather. 🐰

True enough, but keep in mind, not everyone was photographed, and we have not seen all of the pictures. 

Just don't look at their teeth. Of course, no one smiled in pictures back then.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Kuroko said:

back then a divorce was the male getting killed 

there were divorces back then it was just very frowned upon. King Henry started the Church of England so he could get a divorce

Posted
Just now, Mini_Ghost said:

there were divorces back then it was just very frowned upon. King Henry started the Church of England so he could get a divorce

.... you just couldn't let me get zeni to shut up could you?

  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Mini_Ghost said:

Ohhh... damn it :D well if he was catholic then there was no divorces

Sure there was - just charge the wife with Treason.  Ask Anne Boleyn.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 11/4/2018 at 12:00 PM, Mini_Ghost said:

Zeni would like it. 16 was marrying age back them

16 is the age of love in NJ right now.

Can you feel it? Can you feel the love in the air? *giggle chills* 🐰❤👫

Posted

Can we roll forward about 200 years and see if we're not still so primitive by then?

Our society still has so much progress to make. The Puritanism of the Victorian era would have lost a lot of the progress we've already made.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 11/4/2018 at 10:35 AM, Mini_Ghost said:

didn't they have plumbing? I thought they did

Moats weren't intended to be a security measure they were an atempt at plumbing and made out of putrid sewage...

Sewage so putrid you could end up dying in hours of disease if you fell in one..

So yeah they did end up being a good security measure.

  • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...