Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Sawdamizer said:

Would you smash for $1.6bn?

I mean on some lame ass board vendetta shit, fuck no.....But reality?

I mean c'mon......I might consider cutting my whole dick off for 1.6b......I'm kinda sick of erections anyway.  Shit always lands me in a heap of trouble.

Posted

I live my life within some stupid actuary absolutes... And if I trust enough to know the odds of being struck by lightning and walking to put the garbage cans out... I have to trust in the incredible odds of never winning, ever.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sawdamizer said:

I live my life within some stupid actuary absolutes... And if I trust enough to know the odds of being struck by lightning and walking to put the garbage cans out... I have to trust in the incredible odds of never winning, ever.

Did you know Martha Stewart claims to have been struck by lightning 3 times?

I feel like this bitch is on the same shit Pacman is on.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, cyberbully said:

Did you know Martha Stewart claims to have been struck by lightning 3 times?

I feel like this bitch is on the same shit Pacman is on.

Kim Jung said he got 18 hole in ones in a single golf game, and retired on top.

The world is full of pactards, the amount of attention we give them determines their danger to society.

Posted
1 minute ago, Sawdamizer said:

Kim Jung said he got 18 hole in ones in a single golf game, and retired on top.

The world is full of pactards, the amount of attention we give them determines their danger to society.

Well, I don't think Martha would strap me to a cannon if I called her a liar....But then again......

Posted
10 minutes ago, Sawdamizer said:

I live my life within some stupid actuary absolutes... And if I trust enough to know the odds of being struck by lightning and walking to put the garbage cans out... I have to trust in the incredible odds of never winning, ever.

I read the reason we keep seeing ridiculous jackpots is that they decreased the odds of hitting it. Might as well decrease it some more to the point where winning means becoming the richest person in the world.

Now there's some cognitive dissonance to be had for laissez faire capitalists.

Posted
1 minute ago, bnmjy said:

I read the reason we keep seeing ridiculous jackpots is that they decreased the odds of hitting it. Might as well decrease it some more to the point where winning means becoming the richest person in the world.

Now there's some cognitive dissonance to be had for laissez faire capitalists.

How do you mathematically reduce the odds of picking 6 random numbers?

Posted
1 minute ago, cyberbully said:

How do you mathematically reduce the odds of picking 6 random numbers?

Right now you can only pick 1 through 70 with the first five balls, and 1 to 25 with the last ball. Just increase all to 1 to 99 and the odds of hitting the jackpot become substantially lower.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, bnmjy said:

Right now you can only pick 1 through 70 with the first five balls, and 1 to 25 with the last ball. Just increase all to 1 to 99 and the odds of hitting the jackpot become substantially lower.

Well, you ARE the Asian here....But you say there would have to be an increase.....Was the numbers lower in previous years?

I've never played so I honestly have no idea how it works or how it worked before.....I just assumed you could pick any 1 or 2 digit numbers

Posted
2 minutes ago, cyberbully said:

Well, you ARE the Asian here....But you say there would have to be an increase.....Was the numbers lower in previous years?

I've never played so I honestly have no idea how it works or how it worked before.....I just assumed you could pick any 1 or 2 digit numbers

I don't play the lottery often either, but I know they changed it so that the odds of winning a lower prize increased, but hitting the jackpot decreased. I had to look this up myself: before you could choose numbers 1 to 76 with the first five balls, and 1 to 15 with the last. Poorer, more uneducated people are more likely to regularly play the lottery, so they most likely thought this meant they had a higher chance of winning, even though this was not the case at all.

Posted
21 minutes ago, cyberbully said:

How do you mathematically reduce the odds of picking 6 random numbers?

By adding more numbers to the pool you can choose from. I think that’s what they did a few years back. 

Posted
1 hour ago, cyberbully said:

I mean on some lame ass board vendetta shit, fuck no.....But reality?

I mean c'mon......I might consider cutting my whole dick off for 1.6b......I'm kinda sick of erections anyway.  Shit always lands me in a heap of trouble.

I would have paid for your kids college then give you $1 😂

×
×
  • Create New...