PenguinBoss

Wait, weren't you IT?

Oh? Would you care to name some examples? I'm sure some sprung to mind when you typed this.

Are you referring to last year when no one went anywhere and there was no demand for gas? Regardless, your claim is that it's going up, almost immediately, because Biden cancelled the pipeline. It only stands the reason that Trump approving it would make it go down, also almost immediately, which it did not.

Maybe too much tar has coated your brain, so you aren't understanding, but I'll try. Your assertion is that Biden cancelling the expansion is the cause of rising gas/oil prices. According to you, apparently the only cause. My assertion is that if that were true, Trump's approval would have inversely caused gas/oil price to immediately plummet and stay there until Biden eventually cancelled it. It didn't and therefore your assertion is incorrect. It's bullshit, just like claiming it was pointless to cancel a pipeline that would damage the communities it would run through for an energy source that is on the way out, anyway.

I know it's not who you're implying, because otherwise the price would have dropped off a cliff and stayed there when Trump approved it.

The people filling plastic bags and Tupperware full of it thereby creating an artificial shortage?

No, I don't have enough of a presence to warrant it. Or the people that would do it realize they wouldn't get much of a reaction.

Maybe you could categorize your files, if some such witchcraft existed, that is.

Let us know when you upgrade to moving pictures.

Welcome to the early-mid 2000s, grandpa.

Oh god, you're going to have labeled USB sticks for different genres/artists, aren't you?

Your laptop only having space for 3-4 hours of music is the most believable thing in this thread.

*90% of money raised will go to pay for Trump's legal defense

A brand new laptop with a CD drive? Did you get it from HSN or QVC?

This is like changing your background by printing out a picture and taping it to your screen.

@SwimModSponges

How about "I don't know, the article didn't say." Then for a little flourish, post a link to said article. That's arguably more direct and much more succinct than adding in who broke it and where you heard it.

As an ignorant man that fancies himself an intelligent man, I'm sure it didn't.

No, that's not the answer. "Edible paper" is not what type of cookies they were. I don't want the superfluous info of a man who refuses to say he doesn't know. Just say you don't know and move on.

Answer the question, old man!

What kind of cookies were they?

People are stupid enough to buy affluenza.

"Veronica"

Maybe you should tell them, then?

I don't know where you heard he was CEO of the whole company, but that's wrong. He was head of the animation department. There was also a big stink over Haddock allegedly offering temps permanent positions to justify the crunch he was putting them through, which he very quickly reneged on after the project was completed. So it's no wonder they couldn't find people to do it at RT.