PenguinBoss

Bring up how he chose not to testify?

Crazy how he didn't appeal on that. Almost like it's a lie fed to you by political pundits that you're more than happy to lap up. "Also on May 2, Tacopina confirmed that Trump would not testify at the trial.[124]" So railroaded. Much bias.

You're a broken record. Say "railroaded" again. It's clear that "legitimate" means an outcome you agree with.

Nothing you've ever said leads me to believe you know what that actually is

Some are just crisis actors.

You don't understand what I'm saying, and that's okay. You can just not reply to me instead of guessing.

It's okay because they're doing something he thinks makes him correct.

How disgusting do you feel linking a video from someone named "Ulul Albab?"

Didn't he brag that all he'd been doing for years was emptying trash cans?

I don't mean all smokers, just the ones that have grown accustomed or killed their olfactory. Though, I admit that most other people would say "I don't smell it" and not "It doesn't smell."

Pretty much every place makes noise. Plates clattering, pans sizzling, chairs sliding on the floor, etc. But yeah, cigarette smoke stinks. The only people who don't recognize that are smokers. You're 100% wrong.

That place must smell awful.

Uh huh, as expected. It doesn't matter if it's civil or criminal, you always find a way that what he did isn't against the law. The entire point of this is you claiming you would accept human trafficking charges if there was proof, but you've shown it doesn't really matter if the evidence is there or not. It's time to stop lying and admit it.

Falsifying business records. And before you ask another question, because this is apparently the first time you've heard of it, educate yourself. I'm not bending over backwards to explain it to you just so you can say he was railroaded again.

I'm saying YOU'RE the one that claimed civil suits are illegitimate. And I don't know why you're even bringing it up when I was talking about the criminal case. You can just admit you have no idea what I'm talking about instead of talking out of your ass and hoping for the best.

Cool, now do it for the crime he was actually tried for and look even dumber.

It sounds like you're saying his argument isn't "I didn't do these things" but "The courts are being mean to me, so you should find me not guilty."

Yeah, and it seems to depend solely on who you support.

Interesting that Packard had info at the ready for the civil suit, but he's acting like this is the first time he's heard of the criminal trial. Glenn Beck must have skipped over it or something.

How do you feel about the 34 convictions in his hush money trial?

Packard pretending he'd accept indictments/convictions in good faith is hilarious.

Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close. Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway. Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though.

Mmm, nah, not buying what you're selling. No one else is here, either. It's not like they were seen together just one time and didn't even speak. You're comparing apples and oranges to try and excuse the obvious relationship the two of them had.

I never sent the guy in front of me at the supermarket a birthday card.