PenguinBoss

The laundry list Packard is claiming is photoshopped or AI or whatever.

He heard Trump say there's no way to store energy from them a day ago, so he's just parroting.

I kept seeing him spell tariff incorrectly in that thread, and thought he has to be on a phone that is telling him it's wrong. And then I realized he's the exact type of person that would see that and go "I'm definitely spelling it right, it's the phone that's wrong."

Uh huh, something about Trump unfriending him. I'm sure he stated that a long time ago, long before Epstein's arrest. Just like I'm sure Trump had no idea of the kid diddling while they were close. Not that I really need to read anything else besides what I'm replying to, considering most of your posts are just non-sequiturs, anyway. Kudos being able to actually tell two people apart, though.

Mmm, nah, not buying what you're selling. No one else is here, either. It's not like they were seen together just one time and didn't even speak. You're comparing apples and oranges to try and excuse the obvious relationship the two of them had.

I never sent the guy in front of me at the supermarket a birthday card.

Lie to yourself all you want, but keep it to yourself. The only people who believe this are people with a "Trump has a 10-inch cock" bumper sticker on their Ford they need a ladder to climb in.

He means homeless people are an eyesore and he would rather have them locked up than helped. We already know prisons don't rehabilitate, there's no reason to think it would solve homelessness. It just puts the problem where you can't see it for an indefinite amount of time.

Walking on the side of the highway with jeans 3 sizes too big and a backpack? Straight to El Salvador!

Yeah, I already answered that last night in a post you must have conveniently skipped. It would be very dumb of both sides to not have a third party collect it and be anonymously tested, so no objections could be brought up regarding it. Though, it wouldn't surprise me if Trump's lawyer had planned to have an issue with the DNA offered in an attempt to delay the trial until Trump potentially won the 2024 election. The evidence is a believable story and Trump's history of this type of thing. But you probably think that Access Hollywood tape was just locker room talk, too.

You're too dense to be coy. Just say what you want so I can slap it down in your face again.

Who was he offering it to? The same people asking for it. Don't ask dumb questions like you caught me on something. Yeah, and it took him over three years and after discovery was over to do it. I'm sure there was no ulterior motive to it. Relax, guy.

Outside of blood, it's the only thing that'd leave a stain, though. And that still doesn't explain why he never gave DNA for three years.

There was no semen found, which is why he was found liable of sexual assault and not rape. You can at least inform yourself a little bit on what you're trying to argue and not look like a disingenuous dope. Also, an innocent man wouldn't refuse a sample for three years.

lol "Yeah, you're right, but do you know the specifics of the handling of DNA evidence?" No, no, I don't. I imagine it would be done by a third party, quite possibly the person that would do the DNA testing. I don't know why you're asking, since I don't know why it would be anyone different from when her attorneys requested it to his attorneys offering it. It's not like both sides would meet in a Walgreen's parking lot and go "Here's Trump's spit in a cup."

You're thicker than pig shit. If it would have cleared him, he wouldn't have waited three years to all of a sudden change his mind right before the trial started. It's far more likely that he did it but thought he had the power to make it go away before it actually got to trial.

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.

Only in a court of law. I know that doesn't mean much to you.

Sorry, forgot you can only think in the scope of how something affects you personally. I'll explain. I mean "we" in the general sense as residents of the US, as opposed to the incorrect assumption that other countries pay tariffs we impose on them.

Sexual assault

But we're paying the tariffs, already? How about just not having tariffs and we can keep the money instead of funneling it through the government for no good reason.

Can't believe Big Sawdust controls what small start-up Google puts in results.

You guys know he can't link bullshit he heard on AM radio.