naraku360

"No corporation has ever done anything wrong." - Enron

And how do they know what makes the most economic sense? Can they see the future? Are they run by perfect, flawless geniuses with totally real crystal balls?

Or they could do both because they have billions of dollars, you gutter dwelling brainlet.

Shut up, woman.

You say this shit every other day. When you aren't, you're cheerleading the mass exterminatiom of Palestinians.

Again?

I'm pretty sure you don't even know what point you're making since you're only doing it for the sake of arguing with someone. An oil company can hire a PR firm to run a PR campaign for them, or have a PR department of their own. Not everything a company will do is "cost efficient," nor have you demonstrated how any of what you think happens would be more cost efficient in the first place.

Actually not especially annoying.

So, people would see trash cans on fire and instead of doing anything about it, they were reminded of you?

That doesn't matter. And no, a "charity" foundation isn't "PR." It's a tax loophole.

You do realize a company isn't confined to doing one thing ever, right?

So what?

Wtf are you even saying?

What would those be?

It's physically impossible for them to oay for PR?

Why?

Yes.

Prove it.

Prove it.

I'm asking because literally all I did was a Google search for you. That is to say I don't know if they are or aren't. I want you to tell me amd you can't because you're too retarded to look at the links yourself. I'm not your mom, I'm not going to coddle you. I've been aware of these scandals for a very long time, well before those pieces were written, so it's up to you to disprove it. Quit whining like a retarded bitch about not liking the source. What does it say? Is it wrong? How do you know?

Are they anonymous?

She's such a caricature.

Also, for him to shill for them, they'd actually be paying. He does this for free, like a retard.

Are they anonymous sources?