ghostrek Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) To Hollywood why were those three next to them most likely giving a bunch of money to him but an ambassador to Hollywood or a special ambassador to Hollywood why are we setting up diplomatic relations to places within the United States Hollywood is within the United States geographically speaking more accurate name would be special ambassador to the entertainment industry. What's next Trump appoints someone to be ambassador to the church of Latter-day Saints of Jesus Christ AKA Mormons or ambassador to Watch Towers Society AKA Jehovah's Witnesses. Or ambassador to t Amish even maybe ambassador to the United Federations of Planets. Okay I have a strong feeling that a Ghostrek administration would be a lot more sane than this and that frightens me considering I'm Ghostrek Edited February 11 by ghostrek 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 It’s happening because nothing about this administration is normal or ok and idk about Stallone but Voight and Gibson are both terrible people 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 But it’s stupid. It’s nothing. In this administration everything is for sale and if it doesn’t exist they’ll make up a position, like ambassador to Hollywood 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, ghostrek said: To Hollywood why were those three next to them most likely giving a bunch of money to him but an ambassador to Hollywood or a special ambassador to Hollywood why are we setting up diplomatic relations to places within the United States Hollywood is within the United States geographically speaking more accurate name would be special ambassador to the entertainment industry There's been a global downturn in film/tv production since COVID and the strikes, and I'm fairly sure a higher proportion is in CA/UK etc. Their role, whether official or just symbolic, is to entice a higher share of that production to the United States. He appointed them because they're basically the three of the most well-known conservatives in the Hollywood ecosystem. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katt_goddess Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 8 minutes ago, Raptorpat said: He appointed them because they're basically the three of the most well-known conservatives in the Hollywood ecosystem he was rage watching tv in the middle of the night while eating Big Macs and there were movies with them or mentioning them and that made him think that they must be very good people. Fixed. We know he saw them on the late night tv. And all three have a history of being on Faux Noise. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seight Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 hours ago, ghostrek said: To Hollywood why were those three next to them most likely giving a bunch of money to him but an ambassador to Hollywood or a special ambassador to Hollywood why are we setting up diplomatic relations to places within the United States Hollywood is within the United States geographically speaking more accurate name would be special ambassador to the entertainment industry. What's next Trump appoints someone to be ambassador to the church of Latter-day Saints of Jesus Christ AKA Mormons or ambassador to Watch Towers Society AKA Jehovah's Witnesses. Or ambassador to t Amish even maybe ambassador to the United Federations of Planets. Okay I have a strong feeling that a Ghostrek administration would be a lot more sane than this and that frightens me considering I'm Ghostrek I think we can agree if these three got together it would make a MUCH better movie in 1995 than 2025 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostrek Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 (edited) 22 hours ago, Raptorpat said: There's been a global downturn in film/tv production since COVID and the strikes, and I'm fairly sure a higher proportion is in CA/UK etc. Their role, whether official or just symbolic, is to entice a higher share of that production to the United States. He appointed them because they're basically the three of the most well-known conservatives in the Hollywood ecosystem. Can't Trump propose a law or something stating you know film companies producing media in the United States get like a 50% tax break across the board or something if they produce a film in the United States and I mean across the board I mean state County local city and federal taxes including in California and wherever location shots are filmed something to think about or where animated for animated films @Raptorpat Here's another one Banning American actors filming in American franchises or franchises created by American and foreign countries I like Star Trek is filmed up in Canada now but it was created by American and owned by an American company currently little Edited February 12 by ghostrek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptorpat Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 The film industry wants a national tax credit to compete with the UK and Canada, but I wouldn't hold your breath on that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.