1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 55 minutes ago, smiradenius said: No natural cause, you say? Don't edit that out. I don’t need to edit it out because I know how to read 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 11 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Still doesn't explain why the reservoirs were empty. One was empty do to maintenance. It's inopportune, but it's an unavoidable part of maintaining a resevoir. 12 minutes ago, smiradenius said: ...hydrants didn't work... Yes, it literally does. 13 minutes ago, smiradenius said: ... fire equipment failures abound for lack of maintenance... Equipment failures have not been mentioned as having a bearing on the firefight. You made that up. 14 minutes ago, smiradenius said: It doesn't explain why millions of gallons of water got dumped into the Pacific for the sake of a smelt, instead of being properly stored for inevitable fire. The Sacramento River / San Joaquin River Delta is 400 miles from Los Angeles. Also, the City of Los Angeles gets the vast majority of its water from the Owens Valley / Los Angeles Aqueduct. Not relevant. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 1 minute ago, 1pooh4u said: I don’t need to edit it out because I know how to read You said earlier that there's "global effort" to stomp this out. This contradicts that. Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Nice how you cut my comment short. Do you even know what "controlled" means? If the fire starts spreading too fast, douse it. Fine, I'll set fire to the weeds in your yard and we'll see how fast you can put it out. Stupid fucking cunt. Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Packard acting like an imbecile by denying common knowledge that Big Oil paid for cherry picked studies denying climate change 1 Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, scoobdog said: One was empty do to maintenance. It's inopportune, but it's an unavoidable part of maintaining a resevoir. Yes, it literally does. Equipment failures have not been mentioned as having a bearing on the firefight. You made that up. The Sacramento River / San Joaquin River Delta is 400 miles from Los Angeles. Also, the City of Los Angeles gets the vast majority of its water from the Owens Valley / Los Angeles Aqueduct. Not relevant. It's relevant because the millions of gallons wasted could have instead been stored.... for... FIGHTING FIRES! Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, smiradenius said: It's relevant because the millions of gallons wasted could have instead been stored.... for... FIGHTING FIRES! Stored where? Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, smiradenius said: You said earlier that there's "global effort" to stomp this out. This contradicts that. No it doesn’t it’s the opposite. it speaks of the Montreal Protocol and the article I posted speaks of that and the UN so yes it was a global effort. Just because not every nation agreed doesn’t negate a global effort 1 Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 1 minute ago, 1pooh4u said: Packard acting like an imbecile by denying common knowledge that Big Oil paid for cherry picked studies denying climate change Common? To whom? Is it "knowledge" at at all or just parroted propaganda? Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 9 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Sources of internal business documents that just magically appear in university faculty rooms and newspaper editors desks? Leakers. People within who opposed what Exxon was doing. Why do you trust Exxon? What do you use your brain for? I'm stunned you can type words on a keyboard because holy fuck you're utterly opposed to putting a microsecond of thoight into anything. 1 Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: No it doesn’t it’s the opposite. it speaks of the Montreal Protocol and the article I posted speaks of that and the UN so yes it was a global effort. Just because not every nation agreed doesn’t negate a global effort It's not global when only a few nations are participating. Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, naraku360 said: Leakers. People within who opposed what Exxon was doing. Why do you trust Exxon? What do you use your brain for? I'm stunned you can type words on a keyboard because holy fuck you're utterly opposed to putting a microsecond of thoight into anything. I think they're technically called "whistleblowers" Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, smiradenius said: It's not global when only a few nations are participating. Wut? Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, 1pooh4u said: Packard in this thread She's on fire. The stupid is coming off her fingers with a relentless energy. 1 Quote
PhilosipherStoned Posted January 15 Posted January 15 This is still going? I didn't buy popcorn. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 1 minute ago, naraku360 said: Leakers. People within who opposed what Exxon was doing. Why do you trust Exxon? What do you use your brain for? I'm stunned you can type words on a keyboard because holy fuck you're utterly opposed to putting a microsecond of thoight into anything. Disgruntled former employees with an axe to grind? Or, any of those mysterious "anonymous sources"? I'm guessing a few creative writers within the newspapers, as well. Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, smiradenius said: It's not global when only a few nations are participating. It’s 197 countries complying how is that not global? 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, scoobdog said: Wut? He’s behaving like a moron and he’s not worth discussing this with. he’s fuckin acting stupid. Point blank. Period. 1 Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 4 minutes ago, scoobdog said: I think they're technically called "whistleblowers" I prefer whistleblowers, but they're both correct. I've been a bit off with words the last few days and forgot what the word I was looking for. 1 Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Wut? Let that sink in. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: It’s 197 countries complying how is that not global? Obviously, there's a lot of non compliance. Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Disgruntled former employees with an axe to grind? Or, any of those mysterious "anonymous sources"? I'm guessing a few creative writers within the newspapers, as well. Why do you trust Exxon? 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, naraku360 said: I prefer whistleblowers, but they're both correct. I've been a bit off with words the last few days and forgot what the word I was looking for. Welcome to my life, dude. Fucking hate that. Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, PhilosipherStoned said: This is still going? I didn't buy popcorn. This is what we call a lab-grown turkey. Tastes as shitty as the real thing, Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 6 minutes ago, scoobdog said: She's on fire. The stupid is coming off her fingers with a relentless energy. She’s in here talking about “if it’s just a few countries it’s not global” it’s 197 fuckin countries. I told you. She does this shit on purpose 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Let that sink in. No, I rather not let the stink in, Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 (edited) Leakers is what we all are after we're done with this pissy bitch of a thread. Everyone stay hydrated. Edited January 15 by naraku360 1 Quote
PhilosipherStoned Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, scoobdog said: This is what we call a lab-grown turkey. Tastes as shitty as the real thing, I'll go get my ghost pepper wing sauce I guess. Doesn't matter how shitty it tastes if you coat it with fire. 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, smiradenius said: Obviously, there's a lot of non compliance. The Montreal Protocol has a 98% compliance rate. Nice how you try to shift goal posts. 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, 1pooh4u said: She’s in here talking about “if it’s just a few countries it’s not global” it’s 197 fuckin countries. I told you. She does this shit on purpose And she's proud on it too. 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, PhilosipherStoned said: I'll go get my ghost pepper wing sauce I guess. Doesn't matter how shitty it tastes if you coat it with fire. Make sure to get it in her eyes. 1 Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, naraku360 said: Why do you trust Exxon? I can trust Exxon to keep its business documents secure. 1 Quote
PhilosipherStoned Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, scoobdog said: Make sure to get it in her eyes. Why is Packard a her now lol did I miss something while I was away. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 1 minute ago, 1pooh4u said: The Montreal Protocol has a 98% compliance rate. Nice how you try to shift goal posts. Sure there is.... Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, smiradenius said: I can trust Exxon to keep its business documents secure. Did they hire Luthor Corp to handle their security or something? Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, smiradenius said: I can trust Exxon to keep its business documents secure. Why? Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, 1pooh4u said: She’s in here talking about “if it’s just a few countries it’s not global” it’s 197 fuckin countries. I told you. She does this shit on purpose 197 countries signed a document... and then, most ignored it, most likely. Quote
naraku360 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, smiradenius said: 197 countries signed a document... and then, most ignored it, most likely. Look it up. 1 Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 minute ago, smiradenius said: 197 countries signed a document... and then, most ignored it, most likely. That seems like a fairly easy thing to fact check. Maybe you should do that. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Did they hire Luthor Corp to handle their security or something? They're not handing the information out to everyone who asks. Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, smiradenius said: They're not handing the information out to everyone who asks. Whistleblowers don't usually ask for information, they take it. And, since they're actual Exxon employees, they probably don't need to ask to see information they're already seeing. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 Just now, scoobdog said: That seems like a fairly easy thing to fact check. Maybe you should do that. Start with China, which blames all of its cfc output on "illegal" production. How convenient. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 1 minute ago, scoobdog said: Whistleblowers don't usually ask for information, they take it. And, since they're actual Exxon employees, they probably don't need to ask to see information they're already seeing. Back to the disgruntled former employees withe axes to grind... Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, smiradenius said: Start with China, which blames all of its cfc output on "illegal" production. How convenient. Source? Quote
scoobdog Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, smiradenius said: Back to the disgruntled former employees withe axes to grind... Lol. No. Quote
smiradenius Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Source? https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48353341 Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 12 minutes ago, smiradenius said: 197 countries signed a document... and then, most ignored it, most likely. 98% comply but I’m officially done with you because you’re boring now. You talk out of your ass. Provide little to no evidence to support your claims and the few things of evidence you do post, don’t prove what you claim. 9 out of 10 it disproves you. Anything shown to you that proves contrary to your beliefs you just dismiss. You are a troll. Your entertainment value is done. 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted January 15 Posted January 15 34 minutes ago, smiradenius said: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48353341 That’s one country out of compliance. How is one country most not complying. Yes China is being a piece of shit and greatly slowing down the progress of repair. Not reversing or making it worse. The End 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.