mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 it's cute looking but the plot is........well long story short "the lost village" is populated entirely by Smurfette versions of all the male smurfs I.e. the whole point of the movie is to pair off all the male smurfs with "original girlfriends do not steal" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lupin_bebop Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Maybe. I see it as a forced feminism/equality parable. Doesn't matter, the cast they have for it is shit, the plot is shit, and the animation is shit, so I know the movie will be shit. The FIRST one was also shit. These kind of movies are designed to do one thing: sell toys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueraven1999 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 It's just another bad Smurfs movie. The animation isn't bad at least. It's too bad Hollywood doesn't have original ideas. I wish they'd stop ruining cartoons from my childhood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_ghost420 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I always wondered did they just gangbang Smurfette all the time? and was she their own mother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAC Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 All the R34. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 That doesn't even make sense, there were no female Smurfs until Gargamel created Smurfette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Author Share Posted March 28, 2017 That doesn't even make sense, there were no female Smurfs until Gargamel created Smurfette https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CarajhWbXp4 for some reason hollywood never acknowlages that smurfette is a fake smurf gargamel created who the real smurfs accepted as one of their own because she was nice (not even in that second smurfs movie where he does it again to create two more fake smurfs) Gargamel created her because he had a sexist belief that their utopian male society would be destroyed if he introduced a single female(on the grounds that they'd all start fighting over who gets to mate with her) he was wrong, they gave her a makeover and accepted her as an equal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CarajhWbXp4 for some reason hollywood never acknowlages that smurfette is a fake smurf gargamel created who the real smurfs accepted as one of their own because she was nice (not even in that second smurfs movie where he does it again to create two more fake smurfs) Gargamel created her because he had a sexist belief that their utopian male society would be destroyed if he introduced a single female(on the grounds that they'd all start fighting over who gets to mate with her) he was wrong, they gave her a makeover and accepted her as an equal You'd think Papa Smurf woulda mentioned the existence of female Smurfs other than Smurfette and that one Smurfling, especially if they vanished. I'm too old and too grumpy to accept this as Smurf mythology > :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Author Share Posted March 28, 2017 it's like how they removed ms. Bellum from the new powerpuff girls claiming she was a sexist Caricature of a woman when the whole point of her existance was a parody of stupid men in positions of power treating intellegent women like bimbos (ms. Bellum was a genius and technically she was the actual mayor of Townsville because the mayor told her to make all his decisions for him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1pooh4u Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 it's like how they removed ms. Bellum from the new powerpuff girls claiming she was a sexist Caricature of a woman when the whole point of her existance was a parody of stupid men in positions of power treating intellegent women like bimbos (ms. Bellum was a genius and technically she was the actual mayor of Townsville because the mayor told her to make all his decisions for him) Is that why they removed her character? It's sexist to do that (imo) because it implies attractive women are automatically victims of their looks. Not to mention it makes it sound like being a secretary is bad somehow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_ghost420 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 it's like how they removed ms. Bellum from the new powerpuff girls claiming she was a sexist Caricature of a woman when the whole point of her existance was a parody of stupid men in positions of power treating intellegent women like bimbos (ms. Bellum was a genius and technically she was the actual mayor of Townsville because the mayor told her to make all his decisions for him) and people wonder why I say liberals are fucked in the head. it's because of shit like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Author Share Posted March 28, 2017 and people wonder why I say liberals are fucked in the head. it's because of shit like this I would argue the contrary the kind of "liberals" who would remove Ms. Bellum are faux liberals, they're too aggressive and harm the people they claim to be supporting with their actions on that subject, the 2016 Powerpuff girls reboot also promoted an alledgedly "pro trans rights episode" featuring a magical unicorn actual Trans people found the episode extremely transphobic as this video explains (also Ms. Keane's tits are gone for some reason) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_ghost420 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 yeah!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnmjy Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 the kind of "liberals" who would remove Ms. Bellum are faux liberals, they're too reactionary I see this word misused too often on the internet. Reactionary doesn't mean reacting in a conspicuous manner. It means being staunchly conservative. A liberal cannot be called reactionary. That's all, carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Author Share Posted March 28, 2017 I see this word misused too often on the internet. Reactionary doesn't mean reacting in a conspicuous manner. It means being staunchly conservative. A liberal cannot be called reactionary. That's all, carry on. true, but I didn't know any other word to describe someone who claims to support rights then attacks and silences people in the groups they claim to support because they want attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_ghost420 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 true, but I didn't know any other word to describe someone who claims to support rights then attacks and silences people in the groups they claim to support because they want attention that would be about 85% of all liberals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 28, 2017 Author Share Posted March 28, 2017 that would be about 85% of all liberals you have weird ideas of what most liberals are like I feel bad for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_ghost420 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 I don't trust them guys, mochi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 I don't trust them guys, mochi yet you do trust the GOP ::]:: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts