Walter Von Moo Moo Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Laser plane knocks out missiles https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 From the very link you posted: "I don't know anybody at the Department of Defense, Mr. Tiahrt, who thinks that this program should, or would, ever be operationally deployed. The reality is that you would need a laser something like 20 to 30 times more powerful than the chemical laser in the plane right now to be able to get any distance from the launch site to fire ... So, right now the ABL would have to orbit inside the borders of Iran in order to be able to try and use its laser to shoot down that missile in the boost phase. And if you were to operationalize this you would be looking at 10 to 20 747s, at a billion and a half dollars apiece, and $100 million a year to operate. And there's nobody in uniform that I know who believes that this is a workable concept." 1 2 Quote
Walter Von Moo Moo Posted February 17, 2023 Author Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 4:35 PM, atomicinumatt said: From the very link you posted: "I don't know anybody at the Department of Defense, Mr. Tiahrt, who thinks that this program should, or would, ever be operationally deployed. The reality is that you would need a laser something like 20 to 30 times more powerful than the chemical laser in the plane right now to be able to get any distance from the launch site to fire ... So, right now the ABL would have to orbit inside the borders of Iran in order to be able to try and use its laser to shoot down that missile in the boost phase. And if you were to operationalize this you would be looking at 10 to 20 747s, at a billion and a half dollars apiece, and $100 million a year to operate. And there's nobody in uniform that I know who believes that this is a workable concept." Expand So, it's just like the common electric light bulb, before it was eventually made practical. Imagine if that product had been abandoned. Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 4:46 PM, Walter Von Moo Moo said: So, it's just like the common electric light bulb, before it was eventually made practical. Imagine if that product had been abandoned. Expand No, no it’s nothing like “the common electric light bulb” but please explain how the invention and implementation of the light bulb is the same as laser technology meant to confuse missiles away from commercial planes 2 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 4:46 PM, Walter Von Moo Moo said: So, it's just like the common electric light bulb, before it was eventually made practical. Imagine if that product had been abandoned. Expand Not at all. It is the fact that laser technology is not good enough or cheap enough yet to make this practical. Read the cancellation article in the link that you yourself posted. In order for this thing to have been operationally successful it would have to fly in contested airspace. 1 Quote
Walter Von Moo Moo Posted February 17, 2023 Author Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 4:56 PM, atomicinumatt said: Not at all. It is the fact that laser technology is not good enough or cheap enough yet to make this practical. Read the cancellation article in the link that you yourself posted. In order for this thing to have been operationally successful it would have to fly in contested airspace. Expand So, they're not interested in improvement research. Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:00 PM, Walter Von Moo Moo said: So, they're not interested in improvement research. Expand OMG READ THE ARTICLE "By 2015, the Missile Defense Agency had started efforts to deploy a laser on a high-altitude UAV. Rather than a manned jetliner containing chemical fuels flying at 40,000 feet (12 km), firing a megawatt laser from a range of "tens of kilometers" at a boost-phase missile, the new concept envisioned an unmanned aircraft carrying an electric laser flying at 65,000 feet (20 km), firing the same power level at targets potentially up to "hundreds of kilometers" away for survivability against air defenses. While the ABL's laser required 55 kg (121 lb) to generate one kW, the MDA wanted to reduce that to 2–5 kg (4.4–11.0 lb) per kW, totaling 5,000 lb (2,300 kg) for a megawatt. Unlike the ABL, which required its crew to rest and chemical fuel to be reloaded, an electric laser would need only power generating from fuel to fire, so a UAV with in-flight refueling could have near-inexhaustible endurance and armament. A "low-power demonstrator" has been planned to fly sometime in or around 2021." They scrapped the program because it was practically and tactically unsuccessful. They then continued research with better tech and UAV's. This is how research goes for DoD programs. I love using your posts with clickbait titles and and no real substance as a means to shitpost with things that I think are interesting, but come on man. I would be happy to debate or discuss things that I am knowledgeable of, but maybe read the articles that you post first? Haha 3 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:11 PM, atomicinumatt said: OMG READ THE ARTICLE Expand Atomicnumatt, meet Packard. 6 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:18 PM, The_annoying_one said: Atomicnumatt, meet Packard. Expand Oh, I know lmao I just had to include that for sanity's sake! As a practitioner of the sciences, I love to discuss these type of things. But only in a sincere fashion. 1 1 2 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:24 PM, atomicinumatt said: Oh, I know lmao I just had to include that for sanity's sake! As a practitioner of the sciences, I love to discuss these type of things. But only in a sincere fashion. Expand You won’t find anything sincere here. He didn’t even read the fuckin article ffs 🤦♀️ 1 1 1 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:44 PM, 1pooh4u said: You won’t find anything sincere here. He didn’t even read the fuckin article ffs 🤦♀️ Expand To be fair, neither did I. >_> 1 3 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:50 PM, The_annoying_one said: To be fair, neither did I. >_> Expand I didn't either because Packard gonna Packard. 1 1 1 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:51 PM, hornedlizardman said: Packard gonna Packard. Expand That should be in the Rules & Regulations of this site. 2 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:56 PM, The_annoying_one said: That should be in the Rules & Regulations of this site. Expand Yep, alongside Nabs gonna Nabs. Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:04 PM, hornedlizardman said: Yep, alongside Nabs gonna Nabs. Expand I was gonna add that too, but I I’d rather not have a thread in TD dedicated to me. 😂 2 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:08 PM, The_annoying_one said: I was gonna add that too, but I I’d rather not have a thread in TD dedicated to me. 😂 Expand I can't even see it anymore so it doesn't even matter anymore anyway. I guess, however, you could also say Gemini gonna Gemini...or something. Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:15 PM, hornedlizardman said: I can't even see it anymore so it doesn't even matter anymore anyway. I guess, however, you could also say Gemini gonna Gemini...or something. Expand Sorry, man. I didn’t mean to bring that crap up. Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Don't worry about it. It's cool. Anyway...Packard Packarding is the most Packard thing Packard could do. 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 5:50 PM, The_annoying_one said: To be fair, neither did I. >_> Expand Yeah but you didn’t post the article asking people the dumb ass question answered in the very article the OP posted 4 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:21 PM, hornedlizardman said: Don't worry about it. It's cool. Anyway...Packard Packarding is the most Packard thing Packard could do. Expand My reaction to EVERY Packard thread: 4 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Here's my response to every political thread ever (because we're fucked no matter what): 1 1 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:34 PM, hornedlizardman said: Here's my response to every political thread ever (because we're fucked no matter what): Expand My response to your response: 1 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:41 PM, The_annoying_one said: My response to your response: Expand And here's my response to your response. Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:45 PM, hornedlizardman said: And here's my response to your response. Expand The_annoying_one and hornedlizardman: Derailing the UEMB One Thread At a Time 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:50 PM, The_annoying_one said: The_annoying_one and hornedlizardman: Derailing the UEMB One Thread At a Time Expand That’s cuz yous are the same person pretending that yous aren’t 1 3 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:11 PM, 1pooh4u said: That’s cuz yous are the same person pretending that yous aren’t Expand Yes, pooh. We're all verpetas. 2 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:11 PM, 1pooh4u said: That’s cuz yous are the same person pretending that yous aren’t Expand Damn. Our secret is out. 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:14 PM, The_annoying_one said: Damn. Our secret is out. Expand Confirmed as Vela too. I got you you slick mo fo 3 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 7:12 PM, hornedlizardman said: Yes, pooh. We're all verpetas. Expand I know, this ball on my shoulders ain’t just a hat rack Edited February 17, 2023 by 1pooh4u Grammar 3 Quote
The_annoying_one Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:17 PM, 1pooh4u said: Confirmed as Vela too. I got you you slick mo fo Expand You’ll never catch us alive! 1 3 Quote
scoobdog Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Frankly, you should all be congratulating him on figuring out what Wikipedia is... because lord knows Wikipedia could kill half of that mother fucker's threads when they're still in his ball sac. 2 3 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:23 PM, scoobdog said: Frankly, you should all be congratulating him on figuring out what Wikipedia is... because lord knows Wikipedia could kill half of that mother fucker's threads when they're still in his ball sac. Expand Yeah, but...jelly babies. 2 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 7:18 PM, 1pooh4u said: I know, this ball on my shoulders ain’t just a hat rack Expand Fine, fine. I'll respond like this next time. THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE! Happy? Love ya, Pooh! Edited February 17, 2023 by hornedlizardman 2 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 6:25 PM, 1pooh4u said: Yeah but you didn’t post the article asking people the dumb ass question answered in the very article the OP posted Expand His threads make me feel like: 4 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 8:18 PM, atomicinumatt said: His threads make me feel like: Expand I’m immune to his shit at this point and only come in his many nonsensical threads when I’m bored. really it’s just ridiculous at this point. Once you figure out he posts only to do the equivalent of hearing himself talk, it stops blowing your mind. The stupidity of it all😆 2 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 8:25 PM, 1pooh4u said: I’m immune to his shit at this point and only come in his many nonsensical threads when I’m bored. really it’s just ridiculous at this point. Once you figure out he posts only to do the equivalent of hearing himself talk, it stops blowing your mind. The stupidity of it all😆 Expand Yeah, I wish he had gotten the message and stayed away. (I still maintain that we're fucked no matter who's running things.) Edited February 17, 2023 by hornedlizardman Don't want to start an argument. 1 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 7:20 PM, The_annoying_one said: You’ll never catch us alive! Expand Hair needs to be darker, but yes. lol 2 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 8:25 PM, 1pooh4u said: I’m immune to his shit at this point and only come in his many nonsensical threads when I’m bored. really it’s just ridiculous at this point. Once you figure out he posts only to do the equivalent of hearing himself talk, it stops blowing your mind. The stupidity of it all😆 Expand Yea, I get that he is just being asinine, but many of the the things he shitposts about are topics that I rather enjoy, and in some cases I am even knowledgeable on. I usually just respond sincerely, since many of the topics of his posts are actually interesting to discuss.. if he took them seriously! haha ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Edited February 17, 2023 by atomicinumatt 2 1 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Actually, i think Packard belonged in IB, and pooh stated it clearly: He likes to see his own posts. The only problem is he also takes himself at least a little seriously so he may have ended up wandering back to Babbling. Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 8:50 PM, hornedlizardman said: Actually, i think Packard belonged in IB, and pooh stated it clearly: He likes to see his own posts. The only problem is he also takes himself at least a little seriously so he may have ended up wandering back to Babbling. Expand That's the thing. I cannot tell if he is serious but dumb or just trying to shitpost/troll but badly. I lean towards the former. Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 8:46 PM, atomicinumatt said: Yea, I get that he is just being asinine, but many of the the things he shitposts about are topics that I rather enjoy, and in some cases I am even knowledgeable on. I usually just respond sincerely, since many of the topics of his posts are actually interesting to discuss.. if he took them seriously! haha ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Expand All you get is idiotic takes and dumb replies for your troubles. I appreciate you though cuz your knowledge and passion is what allowed you to read the article and point out the article answered his question. It also spared me, and many like me, from actually having to read the article 😆 1 1 1 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 8:54 PM, 1pooh4u said: All you get is idiotic takes and dumb replies for your troubles. I appreciate you though cuz your knowledge and passion is what allowed you to read the article and point out the article answered his question. It also spared me, and many like me, from actually having to read the article 😆 Expand Lmao I am used to it. In my line of work I am constantly having to deal with very technical things and then dumb them down for the customer, treading through all sorts of rabbit holes. So it is nothing of stress for me! Though I do feel that nothing I post ever reaches him, I am glad others at least get something out of it Edited February 17, 2023 by atomicinumatt 1 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 8:53 PM, atomicinumatt said: That's the thing. I cannot tell if he is serious but dumb or just trying to shitpost/troll but badly. I lean towards the former. Expand It could be a case of both, truth be told. But that's just my non-expert opinion. 1 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 Nah, Packard believes everything that comes out his mouth. This is the dude who insists cigarette smoke doesn’t have an odor. 1 Quote
atomicinumatt Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 9:14 PM, 1pooh4u said: Nah, Packard believes everything that comes out his mouth. This is the dude who insists cigarette smoke doesn’t have an odor. Expand I mean if you smoke enough cigs you will not be able to smell or taste so maybe he is on to something 4 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 9:14 PM, 1pooh4u said: Nah, Packard believes everything that comes out his mouth. This is the dude who insists cigarette smoke doesn’t have an odor. Expand Oh, yeah. He did say that. Well, they definitely do, especially some of the lower-end cigs. i once had a friend who would smoke Doral cigarettes, and they made him smell like he had shit himself. I told him one day about it and he didn't appreciate it. (I told him the cigarettes were doing that to his clothes and he told me to shut up.) He later told me that he knew, but he loved the brand of cigarettes so much that he kept on smoking them. Plus, like atomic said can happen, he had gotten so used to it he didn't even notice anymore. Edited February 17, 2023 by hornedlizardman 1 Quote
1pooh4u Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 On 2/17/2023 at 9:16 PM, atomicinumatt said: I mean if you smoke enough cigs you will not be able to smell or taste so maybe he is on to something Expand If only that’s what he meant. He literally thinks that smoker or non smoker you won’t smell cigarette smoke smell on clothes unless someone mentions cigarette smoke. 2 Quote
Gemini Posted February 17, 2023 Posted February 17, 2023 (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 9:18 PM, 1pooh4u said: If only that’s what he meant. He literally thinks that smoker or non smoker you won’t smell cigarette smoke smell on clothes unless someone mentions cigarette smoke. Expand So a psychosomatic response? *eye roll* I wonder if he once worked at a Holiday Inn because he certainly thinks he's a psychologist. Edited February 17, 2023 by hornedlizardman 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.