The Evil Dr. Longshadow

All I said is that Fox has some competition, not what else you can say about it.

Heading out to get a custom picture frame made. (Odd sized picture) Haven't decided yet whether to go with a steam punk style or get fancy with an art decco style. What goes better with a hand drawn portrait of a man in an old style suit and fedora pointing a pistol?

You're butting in on something I said to somebody else, and taking that person's side. What makes any part of listing competition to Fox "dumb"?

You're acting like Fox is a monopoly, trying to crush PBS. It's not.

Don't forget CNN, MSNBC, Cspan, ABC News and several others not connected with Fox.

No. That's the bank's problem for not maintaining adequate capital.

Egg salad with a dab of bleu cheese dressing along with the mayo.

I have a lot of badges and pins that won't make me a superior person. They're fun to wear. No need for any laws that require them. Others can just... be.

Some judges only apply the law when it happens to be convenient, because they're too busy pushing a personal, political or social agenda. For example, a judge who suffers from chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome should not be put in charge of any case sgainst Trump.

Yeah, fine... just as long as all that shit gets sent to the dumpster by a judge who really knows what he's looking at and actually cares about how the law might apply to it. In short, it could be a real judge instead of a hand picked holy inquisitor. .

What are the criminal charges?

You didn't post this? Your name is on it.

There are unfounded rumors that he cheated a few lenders. Stay on the actual case in the New York court. I don't care about any rumors outside of that. The lenders made their decisions on the loans without doing their homework. Again, verifying the value of collateral offered is the burden of the lender, not the borrower. If Don received more favorable terms than whatever YOU think he should have gotten, just look at the shoddy work of the lenders.

You posted a gif without a comment.

Show me the lender who wasn't paid in that case. Yes, THAT case, NOT a motley collection of rumors about other cases that never made it into a New York courtroom.

Did the lender get paid as agreed or not?

You're saying that none of those charges involved the alleged bank fraud? All of this is nonsense, because none of the lenders have been cheated out of anything and burden of veriying the collateral's value STILL stays on the lender. Ai is only going to show whatever is programmed into it.

All this and you can't point out what's wrong with what I just said. Let me simplify it for you. Overvaluing your collateral is not a crime unless the lender has been chested.

Or, maybe he did something that isn't really a crime. Look at his overvaluation of Mari Lago, for example. He wanted a loan and the estate was offered as collateral. At that point, the lender was supposed to run the due diligence in verifying the estate's value. They didn't. The loan was approved. Did Don default on the loan? Had the lender been cheated in any way? No. Everything was paid, as agreed and yes, the lenders did say so. That means that no crime (fraud) had taken place in that instance. Me? Well, I have a copper Zippo, new in the case with its original seal. I could try to collatteralize it for a $280k loan. So, if I do, it's the lender's obligation to look at what similar items had actually sold for. ($25 to $65). If the lender approves the loan without doing the homework, there's no fraud on my part unless I default.

You might want to start listening to the opening statements from his lawyers.

There's a difference between a trial and getting railroaded.

One store around here has put out the pepparkakor cookies ahead of the season.

If the appeals judge sees the case as it really is and won't participate in a witch hunt, you could end up seeing all those convictions overturned.