naraku360

They're going to be so not racist that all memes of white people come with a "no blacks allowed" sign. You know, to stop racism.

I can't tell if he's picking his nose or snorting something.

I would not feel bad if it did happen. Which it didn't. But if it did, she earned it.

Eh... Mitch actively makes the world a worse place. I could do without.

I share gifs when they're contextually funny. I don't give a fuck who's in it.

Lets be honest here: It's a real shame he survived.

I doubt Adult Swim wants him back. Maybe if it were just these allegations but the only way to save even a little face, considering the workplace behavioral issues, is to stick by the choice. It looks real bad that they only fired him after his awful behavior came out publicly rather than dealing with it while still entirely internal. Bringing him back now would be further doubling down on actions they're already under fire for. Regardless of abuse allegations, his actions behind the scenes sound like plenty of reason to have dropped him well before the allegations became public.

Oof.

You should give the old version of that one show a try now that it's been a while and we've chilled out. I'd be interested to see where you land on the better version. I'm down for a show exchange if that would make it more appealing. But yeah, people are bad at rating things. 6 is like the lowest most people go, which is dumb and wrong. It's like a 1 or 2 takes anger or disgust and that supercedes whether it's good or bad.

WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY TO ME?!

Nah, I saw what the thread is about. I just didn't care since I thought of that and it's never not going to be funny enough to post.

Most people operate on the C (70%) = average scale, despite it being a terrible rubric. Especially since the average viewer's idea of mediocre (7/10) is realistically closer to a 3/10....

Neat!

Oklahoma: *sigh* OK, maybe later.....

I know what the argument is. I'm saying this doesn't actually learn and you have to still input in data. What was made clearly has significant human input since AI can't write a script and AI generated videos are nonsense. It's a complicated Instagram filter. Whose to say it cannot be implemented in creative, artistic ways? What about people who want to make animation but disabilities prevent it? Couldn't this help that? I'm not saying there are no valid concerns, but an algorithmic camera filter isn't one for me. You still need actors like rotoscoping, you still need to go in and change stuff. It doesn't create new work. My phone can turn photos into drawings, but if I took a cool picture and used a filter to make it look drawn, is that automatically a worse photo purely because a filter was put on it? Is it impossible for the filtered version to enhance the original in a meaningful way? What people are freaking out over would require the program to actually learn and create its own thing. Animating on its own is useless if the data being input is created poorly, or if the creator is bad at writing or choreography or directing. You have to have an original to rotoscope in the first place.

I don't know why y'all are so down on this. This isn't much, if at all, different from an algorithmic randomly generated filter for video. There's still a lot of work that would have to go into making this regardless of the use of AI. If it were just a case of AI made the animation, it would be nonsense considering our AI capacities right now are still fairly limited.

I'm talking about how angry he'll be when the next Marvel movie has a black person in it.

I don't think he'll last that many inoffensive things offending him.

He'll be back.