naraku360

MD's genius reasoning ability be like Incredible insight. The hostages wouldn't be dead if they weren't hostages in the first place. Who could've figured out such a profound observation?! Pretty sure they also wouldn't be dead if they hadn't been killed, dipshit.

Duuuuuuuuuh they wouldn't have died if they weren't hostages duuuuuuuuuuh I r smart

You just don't get it. The hostages wouldn't have died if they weren't hostages in the first place!

Double post.

None of this addresses the simple fact that the IDF has killed significantly more people they allegedly want to save, and you consider that a fantastic job.

I punched my dad once.

Well, yeah, I just think the "Keep up the fantastic job IDF! Just amazing work," was in remarkably poor taste, even by the standards of someone as grotesque as MD. Netanyahu doesn't care about saving people and he's made that publicly known. I'm being critical of MD only hearing one side of the doublespeak to avoid acknowledgment of how horrible the other is, not to suggest saving 4 people wasn't worth doing. He would've been just as satisfied if he saved none of them, MD knows he would've had no qualms killing all the hostages, and she would've huffed his ass for the exact same incident had none survived since all she cares about is indiscriminate carnage.

If you submit the return for the correct item and Amazon hassles you, speaking from the bank end of credit card disputes, Amazon is absolutely terrible at their responses. Not sure if you used a debit, and that process is outside my scope, but I can comfortably say Amazon claims are one of the most common we get and I rarely go a day without filing several, and while it isn't impossible for us to lose, it's like a couple times a month. I win almost sll of them. Debit disputes are accordingly more difficult, but if they are as competent with debit disputes as they are with credit, then they aren't competent and the bank will probably win so long as you demonstrated a literal bare minimum of good faith. Your bank can probably deal with it if you need them to. I just recommend contacting Amazon before the bank since that's a standard part of the procedure. Ideally have proof in writing (chat, email) to give the bank and be clear in what the situation is, and even then, writing isn't necessarily required at my bank. It's just helpful to have as much documentation as possible.

I think I might actually enjoy getting emotionally invested in a story only to realize it was complete ass when I sober up....

Must suck to watch Adult Swim in 2024.

It was a conversation about whether or not Nintendo-devoloped games and their 3rd party IPs have different content restrictions, which they obviously do. I'd said that an in-house IP like Mario or Zelda is going to be more safe than 3rd party, such as Xenoblade or Bayonetta. Bayonetta being obvious on the face of it, but as far as Xenoblade goes, the way it handles mature subjects like death, trauma, religion, etc more openly than a 1st party Nintendo game can be expected to. Their argument was that Majora's Mask is upfront about death and trauma, and that redeads scare kids. That being in response to having said that Nintendo games are going to be less direct in their approach if it is tackled. I don't think any of that changes that Zelda is aimed at a younger audience, and you aren't going to see as intense of depictions even in the grittier titles, like Majora's Mask.

*IDF kills 94 civilians to save 4* *MD announces orgasm*

The other day, someone told me I didn't know anything about Zelda because I referred to it as being a family-friendly series. I'm no Zelda expert, but............

Has anyone on these boards ever been this shameless?

It's so overwhelmingly sexual I don't know how they got away with it. I saw the uncensored version recently (subbed) and it really is bizarre Toonami even considered airing it in the first place, much less managed to squeeze it passed the censors.

Not sure Tenchi counts as a kid show. Most of that harem is made up of ancient space gods whose personalities revolve around molesting a 14 year old.

You can help. With, like, $700. That would fix my current state of mental decline.

"That protestor was an Antifa extremist and he is so, so wrong it isn't even funny. Totally wrong. It was perfect. Beautiful and not a failure. They were only the finest, smartest, and best coupers to ever coup since maybe even Jesus, who told me himself that we did it perfectly. Wow, can you believe how wrong someone can be? Even I, Jesus reincarnated, told me they are wrong. Incredible!"

I'm more saying that the decisions or explanations aren't inherently logical. We may apply emotion leading it to an illogical outcome, and a machine may find a non-emotional but similarly illogical solution.

I think there are plenty of circumstances that ethics can be illogical. It depends on the complexity of the situation. I don't know enough about how intensive the questions were, but I'm sure it wouldn't be overly difficult to find one that isn't logical. The trolley problem typically has a logic reason behind a person's answer, but ethics aren't typically as simple as a math equation where you're going to come to the same conclusion by following well defined, established formula.