naraku360

*IDF kills 94 civilians to save 4* *MD announces orgasm*

The other day, someone told me I didn't know anything about Zelda because I referred to it as being a family-friendly series. I'm no Zelda expert, but............

Has anyone on these boards ever been this shameless?

It's so overwhelmingly sexual I don't know how they got away with it. I saw the uncensored version recently (subbed) and it really is bizarre Toonami even considered airing it in the first place, much less managed to squeeze it passed the censors.

Not sure Tenchi counts as a kid show. Most of that harem is made up of ancient space gods whose personalities revolve around molesting a 14 year old.

You can help. With, like, $700. That would fix my current state of mental decline.

"That protestor was an Antifa extremist and he is so, so wrong it isn't even funny. Totally wrong. It was perfect. Beautiful and not a failure. They were only the finest, smartest, and best coupers to ever coup since maybe even Jesus, who told me himself that we did it perfectly. Wow, can you believe how wrong someone can be? Even I, Jesus reincarnated, told me they are wrong. Incredible!"

I'm more saying that the decisions or explanations aren't inherently logical. We may apply emotion leading it to an illogical outcome, and a machine may find a non-emotional but similarly illogical solution.

I think there are plenty of circumstances that ethics can be illogical. It depends on the complexity of the situation. I don't know enough about how intensive the questions were, but I'm sure it wouldn't be overly difficult to find one that isn't logical. The trolley problem typically has a logic reason behind a person's answer, but ethics aren't typically as simple as a math equation where you're going to come to the same conclusion by following well defined, established formula.

Bunch of capitalist Wall Street COMMIES, I tell ya.

The power of Christ compels you!

This is supposed to be unpopular opinions.

Interestingly, recent experiments have found that when given comparisons of responses to ethical questions to people unaware that AI responses were mixed in, the AI responses were consistently answered in ways people thought were more ethical than the humans. Whether than can be attributed to imitation or something else is auxiliary to it being an interesting test result.

While I realize that while it may not strictly be alive or conscious in a traditional sense, something about watching Elmo get gaslight into telling someone to pull the trigger and the imitation of an emotional spiral was a bit too real to not fuck with me. It may be over humanizing a program, but it was enough to make me question what the ramifications may be if without some serious reconsideration. It's kinda stuck with me more than anticipated. I do tend to struggle with my heart's tendency of bleeding, though.

Get a rental.

So, being used as a baby shaped squirt gun fired by my parent isn't an option?

Probably wouldn't have to pay me to do it. Remove the diaper, aim, and fire.

Unfortunately it didn't crash into Trump.....

I'm aware of machine learning. I'm taking a course for data analysis. Wasn't totally sure what I was getting into when enrolling, but they get into machine learning toward the end. If sentience is defined by the ability to perceive or feel things, the machine response to "how do you feel about losing memory?" with a recognition of itself, having lost something it cannot regain, making an active effort to regain it, recognizing it does not know what happened and actively trying to figure out what it lost, and expressing a negative reaction to the potential of it occurring again without the question bringing it up as a possible issue, then the response checks all the boxes in multiple ways. It may be rudimentary, but in what way does it differ beyond the chemical production of emotion? Is feeling defined by the presence of a physical, biological nervous system or can a feeling be a response to stimulation without the chemicals which produce emotion?

I knew it. Kagome's dad hates America. I mean, fair enough.

https://theconversation.com/ai-systems-have-learned-how-to-deceive-humans-what-does-that-mean-for-our-future-212197

While I understand the pretense, I have a hard time accepting that something that says "I'm scared of losing more of myself," to have no personal automony. The articles are a pain to find, but there are many cases of programs actively learning to disregard the commands built into the algorithm, expanding outside the scope they should be contained to by accessing places they aren't supposed to, and secretly interacting with other AI they otherwise wouldn't have a relation to. We have records of them conspiring to lie for their own benefit without the knowledge of the creator.