mochi Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 the her he's reffering to is his daughter Bulla btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daos Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 I'm still waiting on the episode where Vegeta gets put on trial for the billions of people he killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 I'm still waiting on the episode where Vegeta gets put on trial for the billions of people he killed. Piccolo never was also considering death can be easily reversed with the dragonballs in their world, death is kind of a minor inconvenience and not a serious heinous crime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Gun Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Seriously, any sort of dramatic tension DBZ tries to establish with character deaths is more comedic than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 Seriously, any sort of dramatic tension DBZ tries to establish with character deaths is more comedic than anything else. not to mention Piccolo died in the Golden Freiza saga in super and he was just alive again right after it ended, they didn't even mention the dragonballs that time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daos Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 not to mention Piccolo died in the Golden Freiza saga in super and he was just alive again right after it ended, they didn't even mention the dragonballs that time He was broken into pieces in the Buu saga. Said he could regenerate as long as his head was intact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokeNirvash Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Seriously, any sort of dramatic tension DBZ tries to establish with character deaths is more comedic than anything else. With the exception of History of Trunks, in which it becomes horribly, horribly depressing until Trunks gets in the time machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 He was broken into pieces in the Buu saga. Said he could regenerate as long as his head was intact. that just raises the question of how he died in the Saiyan saga? ::]:: also, from what I've heard, he didn't die in Ressurection F.....but did in Super's adaption....but then is just suddenly alive again at the end of the arc like he hadn't died apparently someone wrote in that he died in Super...then the other writers forgot that he died and finished off the arc the same way it ended in RF.....with him still alive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 With the exception of History of Trunks, in which it becomes horribly, horribly depressing until Trunks gets in the time machine. it's still horribly horribly depressing, because Trunks ultimately finds out there's no way he can fix his future since his future is self contained in it's own unchangable timeline arguably he could go find the namekian dragonballs afterwards and bring everyone back that way I suppose but it's still pretty sucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokeNirvash Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Multiverse theory; ain't it a bitch? I thought it was neat that the abridged version of the movie remembered those existed and wrote in that Bulma's dad was searching for New Namek to get to their Dragonballs. All he did was succeed in finding New Fake Namek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daos Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 that just raises the question of how he died in the Saiyan saga? ::]:: also, from what I've heard, he didn't die in Ressurection F.....but did in Super's adaption....but then is just suddenly alive again at the end of the arc like he hadn't died apparently someone wrote in that he died in Super...then the other writers forgot that he died and finished off the arc the same way it ended in RF.....with him still alive Hahah that wouldn't shock me one bit. Super's writing is as lazy as the animation. He wasn't a Super Namek in the Saiyan saga, so they get a pass on that. Normal Namekians seemed to die easily enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mochi Posted August 6, 2017 Author Share Posted August 6, 2017 in light of tonight's Kai final chapters Vegeta becoming sweet and nice is not shocking him being genuinely loving in super is perfectly reasonable meanwhile Goku is becoming an unrepentant monster by comparison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandstone Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 that just raises the question of how he died in the Saiyan saga? ::]:: also, from what I've heard, he didn't die in Ressurection F.....but did in Super's adaption....but then is just suddenly alive again at the end of the arc like he hadn't died apparently someone wrote in that he died in Super...then the other writers forgot that he died and finished off the arc the same way it ended in RF.....with him still alive What that didn't happen.... I don't remember it happening at least unless I'm just smoking crack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts