The Evil Dr. Longshadow

I got a new attitude! Hoo hoo Hoo hoo hooooo... I'd have a new attitude as well, if I just sang one song for somebody else's album and spent forty years collecting royalties on it after the album sold two million copies.

I was never employed by either Trump or Icahn. Try again.

So, why didn't he just allow those leaks to be investigated or fixed instead of bringing on his "temporary" pause?

Okay... so do you know when the property was sold to Carl and what happened during the time between 1991 and the sale? .

Isn't he the same chowder head who halted construction on CNG pipelines and instead opted to leave the transportation of CNG to trucking companies? Those big diesel rigs sure burp out a lot more carbon than any enclosed pipe system could. And, there are tens of thousands of them on American highways, ferrying CNG at a much slower pace than any pipeline could.

Trump sold those casinos to Carl Icahn, who rented Trump's name for the casinos on a franchise basis. Carl bankrupted both casinos while Trump didn't even have a job dealing Blackjack there, let alone any control over Carl's shitty busniess decisions.

Guess who else knows better than any of those hired bullhorns. Or, at least he did know better before his brain started rotting like roadkill in a heatwave. He was in a position to help solve this nation's oil crisis and radically reduce carbon emissions at the same time AND, he had all of the necessary support to bring it all home. As it actually turned out however, the action he deliberately chose to take had resulted in a huge increase in carbon emissions. The reason is simple. He never believed in man made climate change any more than I do. All of his public speaking, posturing and virtue signalling on the subject was merely to keep little patsies like you voting for him. That man is Joe Biden.

Go ahead and dunk your hand in that boiling pot.

When I see water boiling, I'm not going to believe anybody who points at it and says it's frozen and that he knows better because he wrote a numerical rune. By the way, the Danube isn't blue. It's as green as the Schuykill.

You can have any degree in science available and still be nothing but a hired bullhorn for people who push a false agenda and don't have any of your better interests in mind.

It doesn't matter how long cars have been equipped with brakes. The sad fact is that even in this day and age, you still Can... not... comply... with a stop order without pressing those brakes. The time frame when stop signals were first employed is not relevant. At its very best, it's a tangent. The sigals are here now. Deal with it in a mature and responsible fashion or just end up experienncing all that happens when you fail to press the brakes. As for the bar manager and all the guys working under them, they always know more about their business than you do.

Go and ask the beverage mananger or better yet, go upstairs and ask the company's lawyer.

That's a pump action, he's holding.

Look again at the one I'm holding. Nobody really knows how old it is, or even who manufactured it. Unbranded guns of all descriptions had at one time in the U.S. been as legal and easy to buy, sell or trade as shoes and hats. Now, you float in here, showing me another gun that obviously has nothing whatsoever to do with what I'm holding in the picture. And, you then procede to make an apples to oranges comparison as though to claim that every single shotgun ever made is to identical specifications. So, when the bolt in the pose photo has a lower profile than the ones you present, none of your assertions are any more than conjecture.

Okay, so I like my clothes big on me. What's your problem with that?

Whenever any action is unavoidably necessary in order to comply with a law, the action itself is in fact required by the law. That works with every law you could possibly name, even traffic laws. Example: The law says, "Stop for a red light". The law does NOT say, "Press the brakes". Notice that the stop mandate can not be obeyed UNTIL... YOU... PRESS... THE... BRAKES? Therefore, pressing the brakes for a red light is in fact required by the law, even when it is not specifically spelled out for you verbatem in the law that is written.

I have a mixed wardrobe of clothes bought new and clothes bought at thrift stores. In BOTH cases, I very much PREFER to have the legs of the slacks or jeans two inches longer than my actual inseam size. I do not want my socks to show when I sit down, because it gives an appearance that the jeans or slacks have shrunk in the wash.

The penalty is only a very small portion of what being without insurance would cost me. I take meds and they have to be covered. I don't want to pay full price for every refill. That alone would cost far more than what I'm paying for insurance premiums. Also, keep in mind other things such as the MRI on my back, the regular doctor visits or even any possibility of landing in a hospital.

How does such an imbecile as yourself even manage to tie your own shoes?

I have insurance and the union didn't ask about it.

Go to any hotel at all in the United States and you're going to get very similar stories. They don't have the resources to hold your luggage in perpetuity. Eventually, they need to get rid of it, by any means necessary.

Lost & Found is an entirely separate department from the bellmans station and I never had access to the Lost & Found storage room, let alone steal anything from it. We have already discussed that numerous times. Second, the bellmans station will only hold UNCLAIMED luggage for a maximum of 90 days, after which it will be either sold, discarded or given away at the mananager's discression, as per company policy as well as whatever the company's lawyers know about such circumstances. There's no theft involved.

Been this way since 1979 and It's not going to change. I wear whatever I like regardless of what the fashion trends are.

Has it ever occurred to you that having my hems slop over my shoes is my preference, even when buying new from a retail outlet?