mochi

just reviewers, if people actually watched it people would've noticed Jared a lot faster

a creepy one but yeah I mean I'm not saying it effects any real person in a harmful way but you'd think CN would know better, I mean this isn't the first questionable thing the PPG reboot has done and it won't be the last, but honestly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri8Xua4dcHo ::]::

actually no in all those cases NOBODY in the show ages in PPG 2016 everybody else except the PPG still is Aging

making it even creepier I've looked into the "mythos" of the PPG reboot a bit, while nothing is official it appears that the PPG are ageless and physically stuck as being five year olds forever however Many years have passed since the classic show (as evident by the Professor's greying hair) and they are now attending High-school due to Pokey Oaks being out of Buisiness and then being "technically teenage" despite the fact that they are trapped as 5 year olds (the episode the Wrinklepuff gals confirms that for them to Age the Professor would have to create a formula to artificially increase their ages) meaning the character is almost deffinitely a teenager, but Blossom is still 5 THAT MAKES IT EVEN WORSE! edit: this screenshot has nothing to do with this discussion but HOLY FUCKING SHIT!

stop taking everything so seriously Mr. armored closet

**kicks you in the shin** ::]::

dibs on your butt before you die ::]::

also

sucks to be you also you probably made things worse by taking a bite of the demon sandwich

the character's name is also"Jared" and even though he's younger than the guy he's based on he's still clearly older than Blossom so references to that Jared are already popping up ::]::

Yeah I doubht she's even writing anything(since this is the first I've ever heard of it)

name one scene in Deadpool where they imply he's anything other than Straight S: (and not the strap-on scene because he acted like he didn't enjoy it and a woman was the one doing it to him)

I suppose I should mention (and this is just a personal hang-up) that the idea that sexuality is so fluid that you can just suddenly change sexualities one day also pisses me off it's true that people (even gay people) can have fleeting sexual attractions to a person who isn't the gender they're usually attracted to, but unless that person is actually Bi, it doesn't ordinarily happen with enough frequency to make them completely change how they self identify (nor do they usually act on the momentary attraction unless they're extremely impaired) Personally I find trying to "avoid labels" far more watered down than actually writing a Gay character who is gay for real because acting like Labels are bad is a subtle form of Homophobia IMO

kay then 1. Tokenism, Riverdale is a huge offender of this (also Archie comics in general but I digress) if the Gay character you have appears to be the ONLY Gay person in the world, you aren't doing it right (Kevin at one point straight up says he's the only gay person in the whole town), Kevin is also a "Gay bestfriend" in Riverdale (whereas in the comics he hates being treated like a GBF) 2. "Baiting" baiting is purposefully implying/coding a character to seem like they're Gay, then denying it at the last minuet, Supernatural and the WETA Sherlock are the worst offenders of this, basically the writers want to attract a Gay viewerbase, but don't actually want to create a gay character, it's kinda like how all of Disney's villains are based on Gay stereotypes 3. treating homosexuality like a joke, more common in sitcoms than other media but generally if a Gay (male) character is included they're just there to be the punchline of a joke about how sissy and weird they are or if they're a Lesbian, how ugly and butch they are 4. Stereotyping, pretty much all fictional depictions of Gay men are femme and all depictions of Lesbians are butch, even though not all Gay people act the same because not all human beings of one minority are all clones of eachother, it's okay to have some femme gay male characters and some butch lesbian characters, but when that's THE ONLY depiction of a Gay person you EVER see, it becomes problematic 5. using gay romance to be "edgy" and "titilating" if you think all a Gay romance storyline is good for is shock value then you should not try to write a Gay character 6. straight writers expecting to be given Praise for writing a shitty Gay character guilty of everything else above, Disney's whole "Lefou is Gay now" thing for example those are the 6 things I generally get pissed off at in works of fiction relating to Gay characters

I've already given my thoughts on this subject many times none of you guys cared how I felt then why do you suddenly care now? S:

to be fair TIC is kinda just as bad as moose Zeni may be too if his pedophilia is real and not just trolling but it seems you're hoping Zeni's just trolling

what's your point fuggz? you wouldn't link this unless you were trying to be an ass

wrote HIMSELF into the show as Blossom's boyfriend a 20-something year old man wrote himself romancing a 5 year old character people just realized the implications of the character based on (and voiced by) him being in love with Blossom a week or so a go and are creeped out beyond belief

because all he ever does is stalker troll gay guys and threaten to Kill people over anime

someone perfectly normal and sober looking walks in, VOMITS ALL OVER YOU then walks back out without saying anything

I dunno in Fates and Bloodright the two "gay" characters were later made Bi in an update so they could have kids but that got hate from fans

S: dammit althoooough it will be fun to watch Moose have another meltdown and get himself re-banned ::]::

heh