some times i think ai image making is glorified photoshop

[ghostrek]

i promtewed an image                                    

most the ghostbusters lefted from ghostbusters 2 1989  winstion only one from 1984 orignal   why is it the count panicing 

 

Edited Friday at 12:38 AM by ghostrek

[Insipid]

Futurama was right about robosexuality.

[scoobdog]

I mean, yeah.

[UwPp]

[discolé monade]

"AI "art" is all garbage made by lazy people"

[-Kudasai-]

[-Kudasai-]

[scoobdog]

It's clearly photoshop for people who aren't artists.

[Insipid]

Y'all really enjoyed The Misadventures of Lola and Ms. Toddingsworth . . . I think AI can be a great tool. I can't draw for shit but I am fairly creative.

[scoobdog]

Btw, @ghostrek, Photoshop actually has machine learning integrated in it for commercial artists looking to automate processes that are tedious and time consuming but not beyond what they're capable of.

What most people think of as AI is in fact machine learning used in a wasteful way.  As quaint as the tools might be, they  waste thousands of gallons of water and kilowatt hours, not to mention the lost residuals for artists, to create self satisfactory and ultimately flawed expressions of self.  One should seriously consider the long term harm of generating these otherwise innocuous images.