1938 Packard Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 No shortage of con men out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juice McKenzie Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 what the fuck are you talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 LOL, this is what the corner looks like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midnight Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginguy Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 The rake is the amount the house takes out of every hand of poker. It has nothing to do with con men. You work in a casino, you should know this. / 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ginguy said: The rake is the amount the house takes out of every hand of poker. It has nothing to do with con men. You work in a casino, you should know this. / No, you can get raked by swindler as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midnight Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Ginguy said: The rake is the amount the house takes out of every hand of poker. It has nothing to do with con men. You work in a casino, you should know this. / I've actually heard many slang uses for the word raked....I means get wasted. it means get insulted....Being raked over the coals means to get berated....But I've never once heard his definition....I'ma go look and see. Edited May 20, 2019 by Sho Minamimoto 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 21 minutes ago, Ginguy said: The rake is the amount the house takes out of every hand of poker. It has nothing to do with con men. You work in a casino, you should know this. Holy shit. Learn something new ever day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 @1938 Packard, you got a source for this shit....Because Nowhere I've visited can confirm this. And no, your mom's very close negro friend she used to make you call Uncle Leroy doesn't count. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginguy Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 (edited) Evidently the Rake is also some kind of creepypasta monster as well. It vaguely resembles Packard.... Edited May 20, 2019 by Ginguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 28 minutes ago, Sho Minamimoto said: @1938 Packard, you got a source for this shit....Because Nowhere I've visited can confirm this. And no, your mom's very close negro friend she used to make you call Uncle Leroy doesn't count. https://www.thelocal.es/20130620/military-conman-faces-last-salute third paragraph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 (edited) 55 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: https://www.thelocal.es/20130620/military-conman-faces-last-salute third paragraph "He is believed to have raked in around €30,000 ($40,000) through the scams." You fucking dumbass, that's a metaphorical use of the word rake....Not a synonym for a con Edited May 21, 2019 by Sho Minamimoto 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 But, let's just say it is. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-raked-in-30m-in-first-quarter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 I know someone who didn't rake in the campaign donations.... *ahem* Seth Grossman. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 53 minutes ago, Sho Minamimoto said: "He is believed to have raked in around €30,000 ($40,000) through the scams." You fucking dumbass, that's a metaphorical use of the word rake....Not a synonym for a con "Americans love a good rake." Close to the eighth paragraph https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/06/books/making-books-a-con-artist-s-criminal-charm.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, scoobdog said: I know someone who didn't rake in the campaign donations.... *ahem* Seth Grossman. So? Does that mean he's going to stay down and stop trying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: "Americans love a good rake." Close to the eighth paragraph https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/06/books/making-books-a-con-artist-s-criminal-charm.html Still doesn't mean con man. A "rakish" man is one who is dashing or carelessly unconventional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: So? Does that mean he's going to stay down and stop trying? Mother fucker needed a go fund me to recoup the last $15,000 of expenses in his campaign. I guess he could be AC's next dog catcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, scoobdog said: Still doesn't mean con man. A "rakish" man is one who is dashing or carelessly unconventional. Or in this particular case, "rake" job. No use of "rakish" in the article. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, scoobdog said: Mother fucker needed a go fund me to recoup the last $15,000 of expenses in his campaign. I guess he could be AC's next dog catcher. And he succeeded in getting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, 1938 Packard said: And he succeeded in getting it. I'm sure he appreciates your donation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: Or in this particular case, "rake" job. No use of "rakish" in the article. Nuh uh. Read it againg dingleberries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Nuh uh. Read it againg dingleberries. "Rakish" isn't used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, 1938 Packard said: "Rakish" isn't used. Because the word was not used as an adjective. A rake is a dashing man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Because the word was not used as an adjective. A rake is a dashing man. Dashing through the snow... Seems a bit non sequitur in the context of the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 (edited) 57 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: "Americans love a good rake." Close to the eighth paragraph https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/06/books/making-books-a-con-artist-s-criminal-charm.html rake2 /rāk/ noun DATED noun: rake; plural noun: rakes a fashionable or wealthy man of dissolute or promiscuous habits. "a merry Restoration rake" synonyms: playboy, libertine, profligate; More You blithering moron Edited May 21, 2019 by Sho Minamimoto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Sho Minamimoto said: rake2 /rāk/ noun DATED noun: rake; plural noun: rakes a fashionable or wealthy man of dissolute or promiscuous habits. "a merry Restoration rake" synonyms: playboy, libertine, profligate; More You blithering moron So? It still doesn't fit the article's context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: So? It still doesn't fit the article's context. Is that the phone? You should answer that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, scoobdog said: Is that the phone? You should answer that. I'll wait for it to ring. Probably the pharmacy calling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, 1938 Packard said: I'll wait for it to ring. Probably the pharmacy calling. Bullshit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: So? It still doesn't fit the article's context. It very much does, but you have to read more than the sentence you thought qualified your incorrect definition. You are an idiot, and I mean, it's evident you are...But yet you continue to dig this hole. Your first link was a failure, and you could have saved face...But no, you tried again and didn't even read the shit you linked to....Death doesn't want you, it's the only reason you're here. Edited May 21, 2019 by Sho Minamimoto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, scoobdog said: Bullshit The phone has been in my pocket all day. No ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Sho Minamimoto said: It very much does, but you have to read more than the sentence you thought qualified your incorrect definition. You are an idiot, and I mean, it's evident you are...But yet you continue to dig this hole. Your first link was a failure, and you could have saved face...But no, you tried again and didn't even read the shit you linked to....Death doesn't want you, it's the only reason you're here. The whole article is about why people like books about con games... Rakes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sho Minamimoto said: It very much does, but you have to read more than the sentence you thought qualified your incorrect definition. You are an idiot, and I mean, it's evident you are...But yet you continue to dig this hole. Your first link was a failure, and you could have saved face...But no, you tried again and didn't even read the shit you linked to....Death doesn't want you, it's the only reason you're here. He really thinks he's a puppet master. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, 1938 Packard said: The whole article is about why people like books about con games... Rakes No, the article used the word rake once in reference to a character. A rake can be a con man but con man does not define a rake....Otherwise you would have a much easier time trying to find a example instead of fucking up several times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, Sho Minamimoto said: No, the article used the word rake once in reference to a character. A rake can be a con man but con man does not define a rake....Otherwise you would have a much easier time trying to find a example instead of fucking up several times. Yeah, well... You probably never heard the term, "diddling" either until you read that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, 1938 Packard said: Yeah, well... You probably never heard the term, "diddling" either until you read that. I've read more things than you've cleaned old man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sho Minamimoto said: I've read more things than you've cleaned old man. And you still didn't know the term until just now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 4 hours ago, Sho Minamimoto said: I've actually heard many slang uses for the word raked....I means get wasted. it means get insulted....Being raked over the coals means to get berated....But I've never once heard his definition....I'ma go look and see. Seems the Google algorithms aren't tuned into it. They only show what's popular. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, 1938 Packard said: And you still didn't know the term until just now. You just like being wrong because it's easy....Diddling has noting to do with a character being a rake....You're wrong, there is nothing to support your claim, and frankly, I don't know how someone just enjoys being stupid when all evidence presents itself otherwise. Now if you'll excuse me...I have a phone number to sell to a few telemarketers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, Sho Minamimoto said: You just like being wrong because it's easy....Diddling has noting to do with a character being a rake....You're wrong, there is nothing to support your claim, and frankly, I don't know how someone just enjoys being stupid when all evidence presents itself otherwise. Now if you'll excuse me...I have a phone number to sell to a few telemarketers. Google algorithms not being tuned in to a particular thing does not make the thing non existent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 Just now, 1938 Packard said: Seems the Google algorithms aren't tuned into it. They only show what's popular. Oh wow, now you don't know how google works...Rake does not define con man, and you used it as a verb anyway....Which definitely doe not define a con.... Dumb, dumb man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: Google algorithms not being tuned in to a particular thing does not make the thing non existent. How about Webster Encyclopedia Britannica Urban Dictionary And source other than Google.....Surely you know how to do research Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sho Minamimoto said: Oh wow, now you don't know how google works...Rake does not define con man, and you used it as a verb anyway....WhicbIth definitely doe not define a con.... Dumb, dumb man It defines a con job, not a con man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Sho Minamimoto said: Oh wow, now you don't know how google works...Rake does not define con man, and you used it as a verb anyway....Which definitely doe not define a con.... Dumb, dumb man Google only shows what it wants you to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: It defines a con job, not a con man. no....it doesn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: Google only shows what it wants you to see. Google wanted me to have your address and phone number? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1938 Packard Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sho Minamimoto said: no....it doesn't Is your car insurance company raking you? https://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/news/getting-raked-over-auto-insurance-rates-1.23801707 High premiums for not enough coverage? You're a rube. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobdog Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, 1938 Packard said: Google only shows what it wants you to see. Lol. There's the conspiracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts