naraku360

Seems rather reductive.

The greatest tragedy of this thread is how much @OwlChemist81 wants out despite deep down finding it irresistible.

Ha-chachachacha!

wow let party

Or cut back on the Big Macs.

I want a cat. We aren't allowed to have pets where I live, though.

Happy bday, @ben0119 Also,

I found that on IMDb since he's so involved that Wiki didn't bother to mention him once. "Jason DeMarco's anime-style LOTR" seems like explicitly dishonest framing. Typically, if you were to frame things this way, it would be referencing an important figure in the project, such as writer or director (Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings, Noaki Urasawa's Monster), not some random executive producer people don't like. l'm not even putting up much of a defense for the series, DeMarco, nor the article. Just the thread framing was like, bruh, what? 😐

The fuck does this have to do with DeMarco? 😐

That's the thing, the side plots felt like the kind of stuff you could omit entirely and lose very little, so less padding in them won't change that they're not particularly good. "Tolerable" isn't a very high bar.

I'm curious since the anime has some of the worst pacing I've ever seen, but frankly, I didn't think the content was very good, either. While it may sound like a troll stance, I do unironically stand by the sentiment that the live action is better on virtually every front and that was in no small part because of how much it reworked the writing. Also, why do so many companies think slapping "The" to the beginning of a title adequately distinguishes versions? It's like one step removed from Nintendo calling their 3DS upgrade the "New 3DS."

The only people who don't like Jojo haven't watched Jojo. It chips away at your sanity with how dumb it is until you see how genius it is. You aren't missing anything beyond pretty colors with Demon Slayer, though.

I did the thing. Sorry guys, my bad.