Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could any one congressman, federal judge or executive name all of them or what purpose they serve?

It seems that while many are essential, such as the Department of Weights and Measures, there may be a few that need to be studied and reviewed.  Have any of them become obsolete?  Could any of them be downsized or consolidated?  Do any need expansion or redefinition?

 

This what Trump has to focus on now, when he really wants an efficient and cost effective government that works for you.

 

 

Screenshot_20250103_183448_Chrome~2.jpg

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, naraku360 said:

Why would any need to?

Because they're responsible for them.  Pass a law... and all of a sudden we need a new swampy pit of unelected bureucrats to enforce it?

Posted
2 hours ago, smiradenius said:

Because they're responsible for them.  Pass a law... and all of a sudden we need a new swampy pit of unelected bureucrats to enforce it?

Darn that CDC and their anti-tobacco rhetoric 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, smiradenius said:

Because they're responsible for them.  Pass a law... and all of a sudden we need a new swampy pit of unelected bureucrats to enforce it?

I don't know what you think congress does but I'm very certain it's not what they do.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, naraku360 said:

I don't know what you think congress does but I'm very certain it's not what they do.

Congress is the legislative branch and that's why the membership has been nicknamed, "law makers".

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...