UncomfortableGoatee Posted November 17, 2017 Author Posted November 17, 2017 7 minutes ago, StarPanda said: Chuck that was my first assumption, but then i realized i needed outside help with my research
UncomfortableGoatee Posted November 18, 2017 Author Posted November 18, 2017 7 minutes ago, CAC said: 42 further analysis has made it clear to me that 42 could possibly be too many... however considering my lack of manpower in the labs at this moment, ill need some time to start up another round of experimentation and testing
UncomfortableGoatee Posted November 18, 2017 Author Posted November 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, Greeny said: There's no such thing as too many. that's exactly what I'd expect 3 women in the same coat to say. you obviously dont have any clue about theoretical counting physics
UncomfortableGoatee Posted November 18, 2017 Author Posted November 18, 2017 15 minutes ago, nameraka said: This is a common misconception. my thoughts exactly Barkley appears to be the clear favorite, but i wonder if we haven't even begun to scratch the surface yet....
Recommended Posts