1pooh4u

Posting like an ignoramos isn’t posting an unpopular opinion. “Sinbad is funny” is an unpopular opinion Saying climate change doesn’t exist or that transgender humans don’t exist are not unpopular opinions. It’s dumb assery

Wow terrible acting 😬

Bowie can be a real devil 😆

Packard, she doesn’t know how to use Google but she’ll create an AI monstrosity and call it “art” in a heartbeat

A critical thinker would realize that a company making money off fossil fuels can get away with a lot of bullshit if they put on a face of environmental responsibility by showing you have scientists studying the impacts of their product. They would also not ask a stupid question like “why would they pay egg heads to study what the shit they work with every fuckin day does?”

Dumb bitch can’t dispute articles honestly because she can’t read https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

Bitches who don’t know how to read will definitely reply https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-analysis-finds-exxonmobil-internal-research-accurately-predicted-climate-change/

Oh look here ExxonMobil is more evil than I thought. They didn’t pay for cherry picked studies. They had excellent scientists studying climate change as far back as the 1970s. Models that surpassed those of independent scientists. Did they release their findings that humans were speeding climate change, specifically burning if fossil fuels? Nope. They spend decades spreading misinformation and denying what they knew was true. This is who Packard shills for. Literally evil people https://www.npr.org/2023/01/12/1148376084/exxon-climate-predictions-were-accurate-decades-ago-still-it-sowed-doubt

That’s one country out of compliance. How is one country most not complying. Yes China is being a piece of shit and greatly slowing down the progress of repair. Not reversing or making it worse. The End

98% comply but I’m officially done with you because you’re boring now. You talk out of your ass. Provide little to no evidence to support your claims and the few things of evidence you do post, don’t prove what you claim. 9 out of 10 it disproves you. Anything shown to you that proves contrary to your beliefs you just dismiss. You are a troll. Your entertainment value is done.

The Montreal Protocol has a 98% compliance rate. Nice how you try to shift goal posts.

She’s in here talking about “if it’s just a few countries it’s not global” it’s 197 fuckin countries. I told you. She does this shit on purpose

He’s behaving like a moron and he’s not worth discussing this with. he’s fuckin acting stupid. Point blank. Period.

It’s 197 countries complying how is that not global?

Packard in this thread

No it doesn’t it’s the opposite. it speaks of the Montreal Protocol and the article I posted speaks of that and the UN so yes it was a global effort. Just because not every nation agreed doesn’t negate a global effort

Packard acting like an imbecile by denying common knowledge that Big Oil paid for cherry picked studies denying climate change

I don’t need to edit it out because I know how to read

Did you read the article beyond “more CFCs have been released into the atmosphere between 2010-2020”? Had you read the fuckin article you would see that the release isn’t happening from current use. You would also see that it says there “is no natural cause of the release of CFCs into the atmosphere” also where in that article did it say there are more CFCs in the atmosphere than in the 80s and 90s?

Which part of “global effort” do you not understand? You intentionally act like a moron because only a moron would think “since the worst never happened that means none of what they said was true” instead of “amazing that with global cooperation we actually fixed something” https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/rebuilding-ozone-layer-how-world-came-together-ultimate-repair-job

We stopped using chemicals that were depleting the ozone layer and it was a global effort. That’s why the ozone layer wasn’t depleted. It’s not that no damage had occurred. we did something about it. Just because we’ve had extreme weather events in the past doesn’t mean climate change isn’t real. It doesn’t mean humans aren’t a contributing factor to it. It’s the frequency and intensity of said events that’s concerning and most likely a result of climate change

Wow those certainly are words

This is unenforceable and will probably get reversed when they have another 2018 incident. That Starbucks had a “no buy you gotta fly policy” and they looked so bad calling the cops on 2 Black men waiting on another party that they made a general “loitering is fine” policy. Either that or minimum wage workers will stop enforcing it after getting spit on half a dozen times.

Jack Smith released some of his report or someone did. They would have nailed Trump’s balls to the wall had he not been re-elected https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqld79pxeqo.amp Smith believes they would have convicted Trump. I gotta agree because the federal convictions rates are crazy high. It’s like they always come correct or not at all

Sack #9 Jfc stop throwing the ball