naraku360

I'm making shit up because I recognized a smell without having to see it was there? If I smell dog shit and check the area and find, you know, dog shit, does finding the dog shit invalidate the scent? I mean, you just can't be this dumb, can you? Because, dumbass, a smoke detector picks up carbon monoxide and warns everyone in the building before the smoke can reach every room. Or, if you're sleeping and a fire starts, the noise is loud enough to wake most people. I've smelled smoke from burning food from completely a completely different room without even knowing anyone was cooking. That doesn't magically make smoke detectors pointless, it means I have a sense of smell and can figure out what something is without having to see it.

Uh... "Gonna throw this garbage in the compactor and get something to eat" and no, I saw a black shirt. Nothing more, nothing less. I already clarified that. But of course, Packard be like

I'd kill myself if there were a day where Glenn Beck started "catching up" to me. That's a fantastic way of knowing I'd become a utter retard.

Yo, 1938_Packard[/member], answer the question, shitbag.^

Imagine, there must be an alternate reality out there where it was you instead of the cat. ::HMM:: What a wonderful reality that must be.

Are you arguing climate change doesn't exist because it's not constantly hot everywhere all the time? whut I can't tell if you're trolling or brain numbingly stupid. Unfortunately, with your consistent stream of dumb over all these years, I'm genuinely tempted to go with brain numbing stupidity.

By the way, earlier today I walked passed a complete stranger. Don't even know if I've seen them before since I only saw their back, but literally no detail beyond that they had a black shirt on. I was mostly looking at the floor, and only briefly caught sight of them through peripherals. Smelled cigarette smoke. Been by that part of the store countless times, don't smell anything. If I go back over there now, no smell. Just a random person I didn't really even look at. Why did I smell an odor that doesn't exist?

None of those can get stains ever!

This just reeks of deflection. Almost like you know there's no pro-climate change conspiracy, but are too much of a spineless bitch to admit defeat.

And how could smoke possibly do the same thing without the droplets?!

You haven't backed up your conspiracy with citations, bitch.

I guess they never taught you that water is solid particles. How could it soak into also solid particles of a paper towel? Clearly impossible. Must be magic.

That's not evidence. That's an assumption. Give me evidence, you smelly rat-infested cunt.

What if shut up?

Then why did they bribe scientists to deny climate change? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry Now, where's your evidence?

Except Ghost Pepper tastes infinitely better than habanero. I could never dream of eating pure ghost or even havanero, but ghost sauces are consistently the tastier of the 2. Habanero is all spice, no flavor. Ghost has an almost fruit flavor on top of being spicy. Can't imagine it going to well with chili, though.

That didn't answer the question, Kenworthless. Corrupt government officials have a hand in the oil industry. Oil industry is opposed to climate change existing as it males them look bad. So, again, your assessment makes no sense. They get more power by supporting oil.

Shut up, viper

Come on, Kenworthless. Prove there's brobery involved in global warming research. Hey, I'll make this easier: who would even profit from bribing scientists to be pro-climate change? It certainly wouldn't be the oil industry, by the way. Global warming from CO2 emissions makes them look so bad they're more likely to bribe in the opposite direction, which - unlike your conspiratorial anti-climate change rhetoric - has actually been found to have happened. So, who is it that profits from global warming?

Technically yes, humans are mammals. But I'm not sure what that has to do with anything, nor does it somehow prove you have any capacity to get laid.

I suppose by this logic you'll never find out how gay you are.

Prove it. Give me evidence.

[Youtube]

That's not what they do. Only a few scientists predicted an ice age, who were found to have used faulty data. The majority redacted the claim. However, the overwhelming majority of scientists in the '70s predicted a rise in temperature, not a decline, and that assessment has been correct. Either way, scientists are able to make mistakes. The point of a scientist isn't to already know everything. The point is to research and discover, then report the discovery. And they don't use 5-minute intervals to determine global warming. That's what you would probably do because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. They use global data year-round to determine yearly averages and use literal decades worth of data to track the increase or decline. A 5-minute spike, as you put it, is completely irrelevant and if you knew what you were talking about, it wouldn't be something you'd bother bringing up.