Greeny

They've probably seen worse shit on the internet by now.

It doesn't need to be Mardi Gras to flash your tits.

I know I am.

I've never been more proud of a post.

This

How long can I go?

I hope not. Fucking weirdos.

I thought most people shit on the second and third ones.

I.......I put the screw in the tuna.

I don't even want to say. It was that bad.

Then I've got a whole tripping issue to deal with.

I just want to take my pants off.

Everybody likes boobs. Not everyone likes vaginas.

You're welcome.

I might be wrong but I think freedom of religion has to cover every version.

Now there's something we can all agree on.

That's odd considering every woman is bisexual.

Lesbians are cool though so whatever. The hot ones anyway.

The bible does say that marriage is between a man and a woman though. It's understandable then why the baker didn't want to support a gay wedding but would have gladly served the couple without doing so.

My bad then. I'm not Christian so I suppose I just went by what I've heard. A gay wedding would be a homosexual ritual, though, wouldn't it? If so, it's within his religious freedom not to support it in any way.

The guy wasn't forcing his religious beliefs on anyone. He was only practicing his own. He didn't tell the guys to stop being gay. The bible doesn't condemn homosexuality now? It doesn't call it a sin?

The bible condemns homosexuality as a sin. He's against the union of two gay people and used his religious freedom to not condone it on a cake. The fact that the bible says nothing about cakes is irrelevant. The homosexuality was his issue. Refusing to serve someone who supports Trump has nothing to do with religious freedom.

Happy birthday. I didn't get you anything.

How is he not listening to the bible when it doesn't say anything about gay wedding cakes? Are you actually retarded?

The bible says no such thing. It doesn't have to. He was a Christian who was against gay marriage. They wanted things written on the cake that supported the idea of gay marriage and he didn't want to condone it, but he said he would bake them a cake with no such messages written on it. He was perfectly within his legal right to do so and the Supreme Court agreed with a vote of 7 to 2.