smiradenius

How about, "Documents obtained by Packard show that Hillary Rodham Clinton has a group of archeologists lost in her left ear and has failed to notify a rescue squad." It makes as much sense as as NPR or WST having copies of Exxon's Documents.

Where did that come from? I just said they had more cost effective pr moves than paying some tree huggers to write stories.

52 followers in the Ai forum. There's a difference between here and there.

Scroll up. I addressed that.

Their motto is, "We dig it up, you burn it." That's as far as they ever wanted to carry it. You're saying the egg heads were part of a failed pr thing? They had more cost effective ways to go about that.

Notice they all have exactly the same tired theme? Why would anybody whose primary job is acquiring and selling fossil fuels pay a bunch of egg heads to sit around and ponder the impending ice age or whichever?

Oh, look at this guy, just parroting whatever NPR says. No critical thinking or logic here, folks. Why would anybody whose primary job is acquiring and selling oil pay a bunch of egg heads to sit around and study the impending ice age or whichever?

That's not what's being done.

They're not hiding anything. Look at those "whistle blowers" for who they actually are. Seriously.. my employer was also a big money maker. I can run to the press tomorrow and say all sorts of shit. If the press thinks it's newsworthy or helps their narrative in any way, it gets published even if not one syllable of what I say is real. That would make me one of those "anonymous sources" or whichever. I trust Exxon because windmills aren't providing my electricity or heating my apartment. Fossil fuels are. For every set of windmills you see, there's a running fossil fuel generator running as backup and usually has to kick in as primary until the wind starts blowing again.

It's not sound business practice.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48353341

Back to the disgruntled former employees withe axes to grind...

Start with China, which blames all of its cfc output on "illegal" production. How convenient.

They're not handing the information out to everyone who asks.

197 countries signed a document... and then, most ignored it, most likely.

Sure there is....

I can trust Exxon to keep its business documents secure.

Obviously, there's a lot of non compliance.

Let that sink in.

Disgruntled former employees with an axe to grind? Or, any of those mysterious "anonymous sources"? I'm guessing a few creative writers within the newspapers, as well.

It's not global when only a few nations are participating.

Common? To whom? Is it "knowledge" at at all or just parroted propaganda?

It's relevant because the millions of gallons wasted could have instead been stored.... for... FIGHTING FIRES!

You said earlier that there's "global effort" to stomp this out. This contradicts that.

Sources of internal business documents that just magically appear in university faculty rooms and newspaper editors desks?