naraku360

What makes discussing homosexualoty more objectionable than discussing heterosexuality?

So you're criticizing Harris as worse than Trump for a thing that a sentiment like this plainly spells out would also happen under Trump.

Sales tax can suck it. Yours truly, Oregon

Don't make me reboot you again.

I don't think we show abolish the FDA just because they fuck us sometimes. There is one party that would like to get rid of all food regulations. I wonder which one that would be. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

Which part of the statement "it is hypothetical" is the difficult part? "It" refers to the question. "Is" indicates the state of being at a present tense. "Hypothetical" describes the type of question referenced by "it", being one that is not identical to reality. I physically cannot explain more clearly. I am saying that Trump, and the GOP, are astronomically more dangerous to our loved ones than Harris. You can gesture at global genocides that both parties will support all year, and it will not change that the GOP openly wants anyone you know that is not a straight white guy with significant amounts of wealth to be dead or miserable. If you are going to claim that democrats want to burn our education system to the ground, delete all welfare, criminalize contraceptives, and reverse civil rights to the 1800s, then fucking show us. Because I don't see it in "generic" but I do see it in the GOP because the GOP is screaming it. There are 2 possibilities if you think blue is as bad as red. Only 2. You either have not followed politics worth a shit for several years. Or you are lying and/or stupid. The fact you're this offended and defensive over a mere comparison of Trump to Hitler gives me some idea as to what the answer to that may be.

Do you know what the word "if" means? It's a word used when describing a fictional scenario that is being used to highlight a point. What words did my question beging with? Hmmmm, lets see: "If, hypothetically, you were to pick between a perfect candidate with 0% chance of winning and generic candidate with a 100% chance of winning.... would you pick the guaranteed loser when it is the only thing in Hitler's way?" It's almost like I know it isn't literally happening. Like, I said it wasn’t in the fucking question, my dude. I'm asking for a reason. You know the reason, and it is why you won't answer. I am asking, if there was a guarantee that the person you value more than anything were to be killed if the person you vote for loses, would you pick your moral alignment over protecting your most treasured person?

No, I'm not letting you run away from the consequences of your shitty arguments. I don't have to be mad to call you out for being an asshole.

Hypothetical question. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothetical Answer. The. Question. Fucking weasel.

Bagging this big, fat, Hitler loving chicken named @Distortedreasoning

How is it a gotcha question?

Actually, because @Distortedreasoning has demonstrated that Hitler doesn't give him enough skin in the game: The person you value the most is on the line for your vote. They will be thrown in a death camp if your candidate loses.

I explicitly said it is hypothetical. Answer the question, you weaselly coward. If, hypothetically, you were to pick between a perfect candidate with 0% chance of winning and generic candidate with a 100% chance of winning.... would you pick the guaranteed loser when it is the only thing in Hitler's way?

No shit. You quite literally acknowledged that Trump would accelerate it. What's the plan for the accelerated collapse? What comes after it's no longer just immigrants being thrown into concentration camps? You want to fight the American military? How? So your answer is to lose, then whine and complain about how much everything sucks after you deliberately took actions knowing they were going to have less effect than the people you chastise. Cry harder, bitch.

Your words, man. We're asking for a winning strategy. You're upset people aren't eager to jump on a plan you've given the pitch of "it will do nothing." Here's a very simple question: If, hypothetically, you were to pick between a perfect candidate with 0% chance of winning and generic candidate with a 100% chance of winning.... would you pick the guaranteed loser when it is the only thing in Hitler's way?

I'm only surprised it was so soon. We still have over 2 months. Oh, I bet it's early votes starting soon.

MD's descent into madness was shockingly rapid. We've been through this routine with a number of people before, and they're usually too dense to see the writing on the wall. This level of denial is typically reserved for after they've eaten their words.

I was worried about MD. She's not taking this whole black woman winning thing well, especially when she's beating the guy MD was calling an insane authoritarian just a few months ago.

Not making sense didn't stop him from buying Twitter.

Losing the low hanging fruit of Joe Biden really took a toll on your mental health, huh?

Not gonna lie here. You are actually the dumbest person I know.