Icarus27k Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insipid Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 No, these kind of semantics are boring. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icarus27k Posted April 18 Author Share Posted April 18 49 minutes ago, Insipid said: No, these kind of semantics are boring. An adherent of the Analytic tradition, I see. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Toulon Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 (edited) Meh, I can't lie and say I dont hate the concept of time complicated to the point of dismissal of basic place markers. Fine, for whatever reason, the past doesn't exist....but when I refer to it in a general manner, that's what I'm going to call it because there's a term for it. Whatever else is implied by the concept is a moot point to me. My only real problem is with the present because there is no way (for me) to measure the present at a condensed enough level for me to call anything the present. Before I finish saying it, it's already the past. But that was the whole of the effort I'll expend on it. Edited April 18 by André Toulon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txanimeluva Posted April 22 Share Posted April 22 Mmm that could be considered an opinion cuz at one time the past was the present so it was at one time “here” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.