Makes you think, don't it?

[Icarus27k]

[Insipid]

No, these kind of semantics are boring.

[Icarus27k]

49 minutes ago, Insipid said:

No, these kind of semantics are boring.

An adherent of the Analytic tradition, I see. 

[André Toulon]

Meh, I can't lie and say I dont hate the concept of time complicated to the point of dismissal of basic place markers. 

Fine, for whatever reason, the past doesn't exist....but when I refer to it in a general manner, that's what I'm going to call it because there's a term for it.

Whatever else is implied by the concept is a moot point to me.  

My only real problem is with the present because there is no way (for me) to measure the present at a condensed enough level for me to call anything the present. Before I finish saying it, it's already the past.

But that was the whole of the effort I'll expend on it.

Edited April 18, 2024 by André Toulon

[txanimeluva]

Mmm that could be considered an opinion cuz at one time the past was the present so it was at one time “here”