Jump to content
UnevenEdge

Kazuo Ishiguro Wins the 2017 Nobel Prize in Literature


Bouvre

Recommended Posts

5792.jpg?w=1920&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=4279a14d9ba727acf7619cd9969f29d4

 

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/oct/05/kazuo-ishiguro-wins-the-nobel-prize-in-literature#img-1

 

The English author Kazuo Ishiguro has been named winner of the 2017 Nobel prize in literature, praised by the Swedish Academy for his “novels of great emotional force”, which it said had “uncovered the abyss beneath our illusory sense of connection with the world”.

 

With names including Margaret Atwood, Ngugi Wa Thiong’o and Haruki Murakami leading the odds at the bookmakers, Ishiguro was a surprise choice. But his blue-chip literary credentials return the award to more familiar territory after last year’s controversial selection of the singer-songwriter Bob Dylan. The author of novels including The Remains of the Day and Never Let Me Go, Ishiguro’s writing, said the Academy, is “marked by a carefully restrained mode of expression, independent of whatever events are taking place”.

 

 

Speaking on Thursday afternoon, the writer said it was “amazing and totally unexpected news”.

 

“It comes at a time when the world is uncertain about its values, its leadership and its safety,” Ishiguro said. “I just hope that my receiving this huge honour will, even in a small way, encourage the forces for goodwill and peace at this time.”

 

Ishiguro’s fellow Booker winner Salman Rushdie – who is also regularly named as a potential Nobel laureate – was one of the first to congratulate him. “Many congratulations to my old friend Ish, whose work I’ve loved and admired ever since I first read A Pale View of Hills,” Rushdie said. “And he plays the guitar and writes sings too! Roll over Bob Dylan.”

 

According to the former poet laureate Andrew Motion, “Ishiguro’s imaginative world has the great virtue and value of being simultaneously highly individual and deeply familiar – a world of puzzlement, isolation, watchfulness, threat and wonder”.

 

“How does he do it?” asked Motion. “Among other means, by resting his stories on founding principles which combine a very fastidious kind of reserve with equally vivid indications of emotional intensity. It’s a remarkable and fascinating combination, and wonderful to see it recognised by the Nobel prize-givers.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was pulling for murakami, but i don't think that's ever going to happen.

 

i did read "the remains of the day" many years ago. interesting take on class. i also like how many of the events in the novel dovetail major events in the war but don't really mention them.

 

maybe i'll go back and read it again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fell heads over heels for "When We Were Orphans."

Still need to finish Remains. It's been recommended to me by several people on the old boards.

 

I think Murakami will happen. It's hard to tell where the committee is pointing their attention.

Nobody could've ever predicted Bob Dylan, after all, especially after the committee criticized American literature/readership

for being too insular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...