smiradenius

That's not senility. I just had a question.

What are fee fees and why would a lawyer hurt them?

Then, shut up.

The first post in this thread is the lawyer. My second post doesn't show a lawyer at all. He's just a guy with a lot of leisure time.

Right over your head, that went.

There weren't any fact checkers until the facts started coming out.

Neither "slam dunk" nor "three pointer" are my own terms. I don't even pay attention to whatever goes on in basketball and would not use the jargon myself. Now, if those two want to turn this upside down and make it about sports, I might as well just stop posting in this thread.

On the basis of a non credible witness?

That's your own metaphor...

White has nothing to do with it. Facts hold up to scrutiny and all else crumbles.

Oh, now it's a "slam dunk" impeachment?

I don't care who did. I opened a stand alone post, it stayed in its own place for a few minutes and now it's here. I know it doesn't belong here.

Because you're trying to railroad somebody. If this guy really did do all of that, then take him to trial and let all the facts stand up to some scrutiny. As it is, nothing has even left the starting gate.

I'm not the one who moved my post into this thread.

Well, has it? What was all that about "witness impeachment issues"?

And how is that even relevant?

All except that the alleged sex partner's testimony won't hold up under any reasonable scrutiny...

The Doge. Any thoughts?

Scrutiny and cross examination seem to fit.

What do you think witness impeachment means?

You do realize, of course that without witness impeachment, our entire criminal justice system would consist of noting but witch hunts and holy inquisition?