-
Posts
36682 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
328
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by 1pooh4u
-
This post reminded me of the time Nabs did mystery drugs he found on the ground. much brave. Very fierce 😆
-
Packard makes every thread she posts in so much more informative and topical
-
Posting like an ignoramos isn’t posting an unpopular opinion. “Sinbad is funny” is an unpopular opinion Saying climate change doesn’t exist or that transgender humans don’t exist are not unpopular opinions. It’s dumb assery
-
Bowie can be a real devil 😆
-
A critical thinker would realize that a company making money off fossil fuels can get away with a lot of bullshit if they put on a face of environmental responsibility by showing you have scientists studying the impacts of their product. They would also not ask a stupid question like “why would they pay egg heads to study what the shit they work with every fuckin day does?”
-
Oh look here ExxonMobil is more evil than I thought. They didn’t pay for cherry picked studies. They had excellent scientists studying climate change as far back as the 1970s. Models that surpassed those of independent scientists. Did they release their findings that humans were speeding climate change, specifically burning if fossil fuels? Nope. They spend decades spreading misinformation and denying what they knew was true. This is who Packard shills for. Literally evil people https://www.npr.org/2023/01/12/1148376084/exxon-climate-predictions-were-accurate-decades-ago-still-it-sowed-doubt
-
98% comply but I’m officially done with you because you’re boring now. You talk out of your ass. Provide little to no evidence to support your claims and the few things of evidence you do post, don’t prove what you claim. 9 out of 10 it disproves you. Anything shown to you that proves contrary to your beliefs you just dismiss. You are a troll. Your entertainment value is done.
-
Did you read the article beyond “more CFCs have been released into the atmosphere between 2010-2020”? Had you read the fuckin article you would see that the release isn’t happening from current use. You would also see that it says there “is no natural cause of the release of CFCs into the atmosphere” also where in that article did it say there are more CFCs in the atmosphere than in the 80s and 90s?
-
Which part of “global effort” do you not understand? You intentionally act like a moron because only a moron would think “since the worst never happened that means none of what they said was true” instead of “amazing that with global cooperation we actually fixed something” https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/rebuilding-ozone-layer-how-world-came-together-ultimate-repair-job
-
We stopped using chemicals that were depleting the ozone layer and it was a global effort. That’s why the ozone layer wasn’t depleted. It’s not that no damage had occurred. we did something about it. Just because we’ve had extreme weather events in the past doesn’t mean climate change isn’t real. It doesn’t mean humans aren’t a contributing factor to it. It’s the frequency and intensity of said events that’s concerning and most likely a result of climate change