Poof

19 hours ago, naraku360 said:

I'm in a deep blue state. Pretty much every city, county, state, or federal election I have any impact on goes Dem whether I vote or not 

I'm not sure why you're more inclined to villify the voters over politicians who currently hold enough power to do anything, like Biden's refusal to codify Roe v. Wade which isn't even effected by the filibuster. What's his excuse?

Codify by an executive order you mean?

2 hours ago, stilgar said:

Voting doesn't mean shit if democrats are gonna give republicans everything they want.

You literally believe in a narrative based on right wing propaganda to disillusion you to the party. Ending the filibuster or whatever weird demands you guys have won’t mean shit if you just become complacent until republicans win a 51 majority and undo everything you did.

you guys haven’t “voted enough” if dems don’t even have 60 majority. You’re bitching that they haven’t done anything with the power you’ve given them but you don’t give them power you bitch at them for not having enough power.

17 hours ago, Sawdamizer said:

If you already voted, keep voting, get more people to vote next time. 

2 hours ago, Distortedreasoning said:

are you sure this is something you want? 🤔

mhmm. You wouldn't be asking this if you knew the beauty that's blessed us with her presence

2 hours ago, Distortedreasoning said:

if poof was being kept under close watch. like if they feared for her life that they have someone watching. 

oh they def stopped caring the moment they booted me out the door

On 6/25/2022 at 9:36 PM, Ginguy said:

I guess I'll go through each one.

First, regarding the "failed insurrection". The Government is probably not charging them with trying to overthrow the government, but rather with conspiring to use force to prevent the execution of Federal law. This can be surmised since the individuals have not been charged with the crime of insurrection. Further, that NY Times piece accidentally speaks the quiet part out loud; "The group and its actions around the Capitol will be central to the narrative being pieced together by the House committee investigating the attack and Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the election results, two people familiar with the committee’s plans said on Monday." From this, it is easy to determine that the committee is not investigating facts, but rather attempting to find facts to fit a predetermined outcome. This is important as to the second and third points.

Second, as far as Rep. Jordan being a material witness, there is no factual basis for that assertion yet available. The closest thing is a statement from Rep. Jordan, “I spoke with him that day, after? I think after. I don’t know if I spoke with him in the morning or not. I just don’t know…I don’t know when those conversations happened.”. So, until such evidence can be found that would prove Rep. Jordan spoke earlier or that he spoke prior to Jan. 6th with the intent to somehow plan, and no such evidence has been presented, he is no more a material witness that any other person who might have spoken with the President during the days between Nov. 3rd and Jan. 6th.

As to Rep. Banks, he did not announce his intent to "muddy the waters". He rather did the exact opposite, and clearly stated his intent to investigate "... why was the Capitol unprepared and vulnerable to attack on January 6? If Democrats were serious about investigating political violence, this committee would be studying not only the January 6 riot at the Capitol, but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law-enforcement officers were attacked. And of course, the committee would not overlook the Good Friday murder of USCP Officer Billy Evans that was perpetrated by a far-left extremist." This isn't muddying the waters, this is announcing valid lines of investigation into the climate of political violence which led up to the mostly peaceful protest at the Capitol on Jan. 6th. (That's for "Gym Jordan". 😝)

I'll agree that Rep. Jordan is probably wrong about an effort to subpoena him being unconstitutional.

HANG THE INSURRECTIONISTS

1 hour ago, mthor said:

Is she a nurse or a tech? Just curious; in my experience, the techs had more interaction with the patients, especially when it came to communicating with the outside world. (Granted, I haven't been inpatient in about 20 years, so I'm sure that things have changed...)

shes a nurse

2 hours ago, scoobdog said:

You trust her?

i don't trust anyone completely

shes hot tho 

someone show me how to be an abortion doctor. I'll have my clinic in the middle of texas idgaf. everything my whole life and i have no felonies. I'm immune to law enforcement. Theyll never catch me. I'm ready to be the hero. I can do this

5 hours ago, Distortedreasoning said:

i got no experience with how any of that works so i got no frame of reference. so you know, my mind goes into stalker mode when you mention something like that. seems like its normal tho. 

She can stalk me all she wants

1 hour ago, naraku360 said:

???

Tim Ryan challenged Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the house in 2016. He didn’t win, but jussayin, he agrees with you.

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/who-is-tim-ryan/

Quote

"If you're a quarterback and you keep throwing interceptions, you change quarterbacks," the 43-year-old Ryan, a former high school football player, said in a recent interview criticizing the record of Pelosi, 76, and arguing it's time for a younger generation to take the reins.

Quote

Tim Ryan vows 'Youngstown street fight' vs. Trump

Hahahaha

5 hours ago, Distortedreasoning said:

im all for revolution. 

we all know the duopoly party politics is a dead end. 

In the meantime can we also try voting and getting our friends to vote. Like actually pressuring them. Friends, family, and significant others. Carry on with formulating your revolution but can we still just vote. Just in the meantime.

5 hours ago, naraku360 said:

Pelosi and Schumer are both worthless to society. They should've been voted out years ago.

These prehistoric ghouls really need to kick the bucket already.

We coulda had Tim Ryan when he challenged her for speaker. Whenever you guys are ready to accept the future he will be there waiting to lead you to victory

And like she said it’s fine bc technically she’s not my nurse anymore

47 minutes ago, UnDeRwOrlDpRiNcEsS said:

What kind of hot porno did I walk into?

She said the spot right under the tongue by the artery was the “sweet spot” for getting a temperature and we hit it off from there

13 hours ago, Doom Metal Alchemist said:

HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOO NURSE!

That what I said 😝

13 hours ago, Distortedreasoning said:

i kinda read you thread in DF, i didnt know the nurse was here...

strange.....

She had to supervise my cell phone use and what apps I was going into. I wasn’t supposed to even open a browser or social media. She was like “You can go to the browser if you tell me what site you need. “ So I described it as a secret message board, she said no, and I asked if she’d go on and tell my friends I was ok but in the psych ward

28 minutes ago, nagakiba said:

Technically no longer your nurse but I'm still around lol. I don't think they appreciated my posts so I stepped back a bit.

they said i can come back anytime i want tho

i want my nurse!

nurse

wya nurse?

20 hours ago, molarbear said:

I think you may be giving me way too much credit

 

 

Ah I see now 

14 hours ago, Chapinator_X said:

Ah yes, the Big Milk

  Hide contents

 

you sperlerd that???

10 hours ago, Vamped said:

I'm not paying for Onlyfans when I can scroll for hours on pornhub for free

 

9 hours ago, Vamped said:

I dont want to know the people in the porns. 

 

boundaries 

 

Et tu, Vamped?

*dies*

are you emulating a phone?