death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 (edited) in the earth innately for us as people, and to lose it would be not of natural cause? disarray is a dysfunction, disorder is uncalled for; that kind of peace that gives us the freedom to be happy is free. no? yes? (edit was just a typo) Edited December 10, 2017 by mumbojummie13 typo
Phillies Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 only when we go to mother nature and in solitude will we find such peace.
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 im thinking that all the troubles that people face, or are confronted with, are largely unnatural. that the intended purpose for living is to enjoy who you are.
Phillies Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said: im thinking that all the troubles that people face, or are confronted with, are largely unnatural. that the intended purpose for living is to enjoy who you are. Yes all our problems are unnatural. We pay taxes for god's land, think about this god owns the land and we pay taxes, then we need to buy shit we don't need (fancy cars, clothes, etc.) , we get addicted to drugs which fuck us up, etc. etc. The indians living here didn't have these issues and then we came and kicked them out.
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 im just trying to explain to a so called brother, that you dont involve yourself in other peoples private affairs, especially ones concerning deep emotion and dedication. sometimes external influences make things a lot worse, especially where there not invited. then i started thinking, all of life is like that. no one and nothing desires interference. life is naturally peaceful, and that is meant to be that way. things that make it harder dont belong.
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 in the long run theres always a lot of work to get where you are going, but the end result is intended to be peaceful and satisfying, and i cant think of a single situation proving thats not true
Phillies Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 10 minutes ago, mumbojummie13 said: in the long run theres always a lot of work to get where you are going, but the end result is intended to be peaceful and satisfying, and i cant think of a single situation proving thats not true why does it have to be so difficult as to have a destination? Why does peace have to have a destination ? It should be free and available anytime.
Hornshire Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 It is conflict that improves the lot of civilization and single being both. Conflict forces one to better oneself. It forces change, growth, adaptation... evolution... or death. These are not our laws, but the universe's. Without conflict you have only stagnation.
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Kweerie said: It is conflict that improves the lot of civilization and single being both. Conflict forces one to better oneself. It forces change, growth, adaptation... evolution... or death. These are not our laws, but the universe's. Without conflict you have only stagnation. that is also true. but determination, perseverance, dedication, learning to be above conflict: all end up without strife as intended, maybe through some difficulties. but a peaceful end is the common relation. 1
Hornshire Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 We do not see the end as an end. It is sterile, and void of meaning or purpose.
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 i think we all find peace with what we do an ultimate completion is not obtainable you are correct
Katya_Hiki Posted December 10, 2017 Posted December 10, 2017 psh you believe there's an earth? amateur
death_by_motorboat Posted December 10, 2017 Author Posted December 10, 2017 yeah because the void above us is too scary so i think we're earthlings. yeah
Recommended Posts